[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm woes continue for Oswego County residents  

A proposed wind farm in Jefferson County has Oswego County residents upset because they could be forced into giving up property rights so that power lines can run from one county to the other.

The project, proposed for Galloo Island, located in the Jefferson County Town of Hounsfield, would require power lines to come ashore off Lake Ontario in Henderson and travel south through Oswego County to Parish.

Oswego County legislators have begun receiving telephone calls from angry constituents who received letters requesting the sale of right-of-ways or face eminent domain proceedings.

Upstate NY Power, the company sending the letters, has applied to install 77 wind turbines in Jefferson County.

No one from Oswego County government was made aware of the proposal, drawing the ire of Oswego County Legislature Chairman Barry Leemann. He took the opportunity to criticize area Assemblyman Darrel Aubertine, who is running for the 48th District Senate seat in Tuesday’s special election, for failing to contact county government with information about the proposed project.

“I am not pleased that Mr. Aubertine did not find it necessary to contact us in regard to this project,” Leemann said.

A meeting on the proposed wind farm was held in Jefferson County Feb. 14, the day of the legislature meeting. Because of the conflict, Leemann sent a representative while Cornell Cooperative Extension of Oswego County sent Director Paul Forestiere. Local Assemblyman Will Barclay attended on behalf of the county, as well.

“The meeting room held 100 people and they had 150 in attendance,” Leemann said, adding that the majority of those in attendance were from Oswego County.

Because the legislature and the residents continue to be left in the dark about the project and the implications to county residents, the county will co-host an informational meeting in the near future, Leemann noted. He added that representatives of the Public Service Commission were not in attendance at the Jefferson County meeting but will be present when Oswego County holds its session, expected to be at the H. Douglas Barclay Court House in Pulaski.

“The people want to have the meeting at that end of the county,” Leemann said. “We’ll know much, much more when we have the meeting here.”

He said that he has heard that the wind turbine company is looking to see what sort of reception they get from county residents and, if they are not well-received, may find an alternate route for the power lines, although it could still be in Oswego County.

“We’ve been told the power-line trail is negotiable,” Leemann stated.

Residents who received the letters were told if they did not respond by Feb. 25, the company may use the power of eminent domain to obtain access to their properties.

Leemann said those residents should wait and not panic over the possibility of eminent-domain proceedings. The project has not been introduced to the county planning department, something that is required, he noted.

Aubertine, who has made a campaign issue about the right to access public property by others, said through a spokesperson that the local residents deserve a role in the consideration of the placement of the transmission lines.

“Darrel strongly supports wind farms and other forms of alternative energies, but also feels very strongly that local residents deserve a role in the consideration as to where the placement of transmission lines, etc. should be,” Aubertine campaign staff member Travis Proulx said Wednesday.
“He believes that his role as a public official, regardless of where he is serving, should be to help the local residents take an active role in such discussions so that local issues and concerns are heard loud and clear.”

Aubertine’s staff did not respond to other questions about the project, such as when he first became aware of it and how he would assist the residents.

by Carol Thompson

The Valley News Online

23 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.