LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Western Marylanders given short shrift 

In each of three items – the “Mass of Humanity” photo, the “Huge Majority” news article, and the “Exceedingly Proud” editorial found in the January 31 Republican – it was prominently declared or noted that an estimated 500 citizens “more than filled the auditorium of Garrett College.”

Yet the (Baltimore) Sun newspaper article for the same event cited a figure of only 200 citizens!

It is frequently observed that the powers that be in Annapolis and Baltimore give short shrift to, and frequently don’t count, the voters, or the opinions of voters, in either western Maryland or “Mountain Maryland.”

It brought to mind during this, Black History Month, that when the Founding Fathers sought to form this nation, one of the sticking points was how to allot proportional representation to southern states where slaves formed a major part of the population, hut they had no votes. It was ultimately decided that slaves represented a fraction of a free man, and therefore an agreed ratio was established by which to determine the number of representatives for southern states.

This proportional representation may still be in effect today. It would appear the haughty Baltimore Sun has determined it takes 2.5 Mountain Maryland citizens to equal one Baltimore or Annapolis citizen! No wonder the voices of Mountain Maryland and western Maryland citizens are ignored in Baltimore and Annapolis!

Sincerely yours,

Douglas Scott Arey

Cumberland

The Republican

21 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky