[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Objectors win the day in latest wind farm battle  

A controversial plan to build a wind farm on a sensitive habitat near the Pentland Hills was thrown out by councillors yesterday.

Energy company E.ON UK wanted to build 18 turbines on a raised bog at Auchencorth Moss near Penicuik, but the scheme attracted about 2,400 objections and opposition from groups including the Scottish Wildlife Trust, Friends of the Pentlands and the Butterfly Conservation Society.

Naturalist David Bellamy described the plan as “an act of international vandalism” of a habitat which he said was as important as a tropical rain-forest in terms of nature conservation.

The decision by Midlothian Council’s planning committee came as the developers behind another controversial wind-farm proposal – to build 181 turbines on Lewis at a cost of about £500 million – met government officials yesterday in the hope of rescuing the controversial plan.

The Scottish Government has indicated that it is “minded to refuse” the proposal.

Meanwhile, Midlothian Council leader Derek Milligan, who chaired the planning committee meeting during consideration of the Auchencorth application, said: “We have tried to balance the undoubted need for more renewable energy sources against the serious detrimental impact that the development would have had on the local environment.”

Protestor Tony Trewavis, a professor of plant biology at Edinburgh University, said the wind farm would have wiped out a colony of endangered large heath butterflies.

An E.ON spokesman said they were “considering our options” when asked whether they would appeal. “We’re obviously very disappointed with the outcome. We think it is an excellent scheme.”

By Ian Johnston

The Scotsman

13 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.