[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Crown Estate an 'extra cost'  

Northern isles MP yesterday (Tuesday) blasted the Crown Estate for taking “as much as they can” but offering “very little in return”.

His scathing attack came after figures released by the UK government showed the Crown Estate had last year earned more than £700,000 in seabed rent from offshore renewable energy projects, an increase of more than 28,000 per cent compared to 2002/03.

Rob Hastings, director of the marine estate at the Crown Estate responded by saying the income reflected on the success of the offshore renewable industry.

The government figures, released in a written answer to questions by Mr Carmichael, show that seabed rent income for offshore wind turbines has steadily risen from £2,500 in 2002/03 to £181,000 in 2004/05 and £721,000 in 2006/07.

Yesterday, The Times newspaper reported that energy industry sources had reported that the Crown Estate could earn as much as £100 million a year from Britain’s booming offshore renewable energy industry by 2020.

The Crown Estate owns all the seabed out to the 12 miles limit and profits made through rent is paid to the Treasury.

Mr Carmichael said the Crown Estate had a history of taking money for doing nothing from its ownership of the seabed.

“These figures show graphically the way in which they will take as much as they can but offer very little in return.

“The Crown Estate are simply an extra cost to the renewable industry with no discernable benefit.”

He added he now understood why the Crown Estate was so “enthusiastic” about a proposed sub sea cable running along the east coast of the country. A study commissioned by the Crown Estate found such a cable to be viable in a report published last month.

“Such a cable could be a good thing, but if it is to be taxed by the Crown Estate Commissioners then money which could be used to develop green energy will instead go straight back to the Treasury,” Mr Carmichael said.

Mr Hasting said: “The Crown Estate charges rent to offshore wind developers for placement of turbines on the seabed. This is typically around 1per cent of the value of electricity generated by offshore windfarms – so the £721,000 figure represents rental income from an industry that, across the UK, made around £70 million in 2006/7.

“All this money is paid to the Treasury for the benefit of all UK taxpayers. To date, the Crown Estate has not received any income from offshore renewable projects in Scotland.”

He added that Crown Estate was supporting the renewables industry, including the EMEC centre in Orkney which uses the seabed to test tidal energy devices.

“We expect to invest £185 million in Scottish marine projects over the next five years alone.

“Recent examples of our work include exploring the viability of an east coast sub-sea cable from Shetland – a development which could boost employment in the isles – and working with partner organisations including the Scottish Government on the Pentland Firth Tidal Energy Project,” he said.

The figures mentioned yesterday were of no great concern to windfarm developers locally as seabed rent was not directly an issue for them.

A spokesman for Viking Energy said its project was onshore and Crown Estate rent charges would only be a minor part of the overall charges payable to the owner of a future subsea cable that is proposed to connect Shetland with mainland Scotland.

By Hans J. Marter

The Shetland News

13 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.