[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Harmful impacts  

Your column on the new proposed wind turbines includes a suggestion that windmills would replace pylons. Probably even more pylons will be needed.

The existing pylons will be needed for backup when there is no wind. And, since underground cables are ferociously expensive, even when subsidies hide real costs, the wind turbines will need pylons themselves, if they really can produce lots of power.

But inland Oxfordshire is not well placed to deliver much wind power.

The quote of 5,000 houses probably means a rated power sufficient to boil 5,000 kettles (are the proposers afraid of kilowatts?) and, if the efficiency is typical of the 7.7 per cent for other inland wind turbines quoted by the Renewable Energy Foundation (http://www.ref.org.uk/energydata.php), the average will be more like 350 kettles.

It would be useful if the city climate change officer, Paul Spencer, were to publish authenticated efficiencies for wind turbines in and around Oxfordshire. There really must be proper advance tests of efficiency: the climate will only benefit if the carbon savings over the operating life exceed the carbon costs of manufacture and installation. The results of such tests should be available to the public when planning permission is sought. Well-intentioned gestures, whilst tempting, can have harmful impacts.

If we want fewer pylons, a better and shorter-term solution (as the Energy Saving Trust stresses) is to turn down central heating and insulate buildings – homes, shops, and (dare I say it?) even council premises.

Professor Marshall Stoneham FRS, Dorchester-on-Thames

This Is Oxfordshire

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.