LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

The wind of change 

The Dorset and Hampshire coast is unlikely to be a target for offshore wind farms, says a leading planning expert.

But James Cain believes the area may see its fair share of applications for land-based sites.

Mr Cain, a nationally acknowledged expert on wind turbines, spoke after new targets for renewable energy were unveiled by the European Union.

Under ambitious plans, the EU aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 20 per cent by 2020 and wants the UK to generate 15 per cent of its total energy demand from wind, solar or wave technology. This means by 2020, 40 per cent of electricity must come from those three sources.

Currently the figure is just two per cent. Some estimates predict a rise in offshore turbines from the current 150 to around 7,500.

Mr Cain, a planner with Bournemouth law firm Horsey Lightly Fynn, says it’s “extremely unlikely” that Dorset and Hampshire will see any offshore wind farms.

“Most of these will be sited on the east coast of the UK and some in the Irish Sea and Bristol Channel.

“Our stretch of coastline is unlikely to be looked at in the third round of new offshore wind farms for a number of reasons.

“Much of it has special protection, it may be too expensive to transfer the energy to land and there are issues of depth of water and insufficient wind.”

Mr Cain added: “The impact in the two counties is much more likely to be from onshore farms, ranging from micro’ turbines to wind farms and we have already seen just how controversial such schemes can be, with proposals in both Poole and Purbeck.”

He said turbines had the capacity to split public opinion down the middle.

“People either love them or hate them, especially as they bring all sorts of issues with them including size, noise, health and general environmental concerns.

“We are bound to see a huge increase in planning applications for them and they are inevitably going to stir up controversy, probably even more so than phone masts.”

Bournemouth Echo

30 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon