[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Bill would benefit public power projects like Energy Northwest wind farms  

OLYMPIA – The Legislature is considering a bill that would front cash incentives owed by the federal government to public developers of wind farms and other environmentally friendly power projects.

In Washington, that would be Energy Northwest. It operates the Nine Canyon Wind Project south of the Tri-Cities and estimates it had been shorted $5 million through 2006 because Congress hasn’t approved enough money to fund publicly owned projects nationwide.

The Renewable Energy Production Incentive, or REPI, program was set up in 1992 alongside a separate incentive program for private companies that develop clean energy projects. While private developers get tax credits, public developers get cash payments.

And without adequate funding for those payments, projects developed by public entities don’t get equal subsidies and are at a competitive disadvantage, said Jack Baker, Energy Northwest’s vice president for energy business services.

“There are consequences,” Baker told the House Technology, Energy and Communications Committee on Tuesday.

The public power consortium for two years has been pitching a wind project on land south of Reardan near Spokane but has been unable to find suitors. That’s partly due to poorer wind conditions than can be found at Nine Canyon, but Baker said Tuesday that it’s also because of the federal government’s poor track record of funding REPI payments that would help drive down the project’s power costs.

“Without any REPI payments we cannot develop the Reardan wind site,” he said. “We’re not getting that leadership from the federal government so we’re asking the state to step up. It won’t get developed by public power without an incentive.”

House Bill 2994 would require the state to put up the money, then be reimbursed once the federal government makes good on its commitment.

It figures to be a tough lift this session, when lawmakers are eager to hold the line on new spending but “this is a discussion we know is going to have to happen,” said Jim Rowland, a lobbyist for Okanogan PUD, the single largest participant in the Nine Canyon project.

Carrie Dolwick, a policy associate for the green-leaning Northwest Energy Coalition, said subsidy programs have effectively stimulated the market for clean energy projects when they’ve been funded.

“This bill would establish the state as a backstop,” she said.

By Chris Mulick
Herald Olympia Bureau

Tri-City Herald

30 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.