[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm's costs up $10M but plant proceeds 

The Melancthon Township portion of the 132-megawatt Melancthon II wind farm will be under construction this spring, but there has been no apparent resolution of substation noise complaints that are holding up the Amaranth Township portion.

Canadian Hydro Developers Inc. has confirmed that the foundations for Melancthon’s 66 turbines, along with access roads plus an expansion of its operations and maintenance building have all been completed.

“The Company continues to await the final Order from the (Ontario Municipal Board) approving the Amaranth Township portion(22 wind turbines, and expects that such an order will be issued prior to construction re-commencing in the spring of 2008,” CHD says in a news release.

The wind farm was the subject of OMB hearings in both townships. The Melancthon portion won approval last July, but the final OMB order for the entire project has been withheld pending a resolution of the transformer substation noise complaints.

CHD says it expects the plant to be operational by the end of November, but the delays have raised the estimated capital cost $10 million, to $285 million from the previously estimated $275 million.

Meantime, Amaranth CEO Sue Stone said this week that there has been no indication of when the OMB hearing will recommence. Hearing officer Norm Jackson had indicated it could be convened on a week’s notice.

At the substation, neighbour Paul Thompson said there has been some activity at the transformer, but he doubted there had been any progress “as far as I’m concerned.”

In a discussion outside an unrelated meeting recently, Mr. Thompson said the prescribed noise monitoring program was continuing. However, he said the monitors had failed to pick up the sounds of a stereo although it could be heard by the naked ear.

The problem at the substation is that the wind farm requires a second transformer. Mr. Thompson and at least two other neighbours say the second transformer would double the noise impact.

Mr. Jackson has indicated he would withhold his decision and order until the transformer issue has been resolved.

By Wes Keller
Freelance Reporter

Orangeville Citizen

24 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky