[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

SCC plays vital role in project approvals  

One senator wants to strip a layer of protection from the permitting of smaller wind power projects.

Sen. Frank Wagner doesn’t want the State Corporation Commission scrutinizing small windmill farms. He’s proposed legislation to exempt wind farms, like the Highland County project, that produce less than 50 megawatts from SCC authority.

That would be a big mistake, eliminating very necessary environmental safeguards.

Small wind farms have the potential to cause a lot of environmental damage.

“There is no comprehensive and reliable state-level environmental review of wind-energy projects other than that by the SCC,” Rick Webb, a scientist at the University of Virginia and opponent of the Highland project, told the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

Wagner says his bill won’t affect the Highland farm, which has already received a permit from the SCC.

Some attorneys question that assumption, though, and it doesn’t take much of a leap to imagine Highland New Wind Development using the legislation to get out of the strict monitoring conditions the SCC permit requires.

The Highland project demonstrates the need for SCC scrutiny and permitting – even for smaller wind farms.

Wagner said the Highland permitting shows the need for streamlining the permitting process. But in 2006 , he helped pass a bill that promised to, well, streamline the permitting process for renewable energy sources, including wind. Regulations implementing that legislation were just written last year.

Does this year’s proposal mean the 2006 bill was a bust? Or has Wagner failed to give his own initiative time to work?

We supported the Highland project, but only because the SCC permit required monitoring that would show whether the number of bird and bat kills were acceptable. The permit also required the company to put up a bond that would cover the cost of taking the windmills down if the environmental cost proves too high.

Those are important caveats that would not have been part of a process that didn’t include the SCC.

Wagner’s bill would strip a layer of protection from the approval process.

It should be defeated.

The Roanoke Times

23 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.