[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Public accounts committee questions discrepancies in wind farm contracts, hiring practices  

Auditor general says some contracts not properly approved, several firms hired without contracts or competition

Members of the province’s public accounts committee questioned information in the 2007 auditor general’s report on Tuesday showing that when P.E.I.’s wind farms were being designed and built, several people were employed without contracts or without competitive process.

The committee is reviewing the report, released last April, to try and get a handle on the province’s finances.

During an audit of the management, planning and contracting of the wind turbines in North Cape and East Point, P.E.I. Auditor General Colin Younker found a number of discrepancies in contract approvals and hiring practices by the P.E.I. Energy Corporation.

Some contracts were not approved by the Treasury Board or by Executive Council, as provincial regulation stipulates. And on several occasions, firms and services were hired without a signed contract.

Murray River MLA Charlie McGeoghegan was incredulous as the committee read through this section of the report.

“There’s basically no signed contracts,” he said of the wind farm construction. “That’s kind of a problem isn’t it?”

During phase I of the North Cape wind farm construction, for example, one of the technical engineering firms was hired without a competitive process and there was no contract signed. This also occurred during phase II with a consulting company, an engineering firm and for the foundation construction and in East Point during the construction phase.

“So they just hired whoever they wanted?” McGeoghegan asked.

“Yes, in this case,” Younker replied.

He added that in some of these cases the Energy Corporation chose to hire people who had done work with them before.

“Still there wasn’t a competitive process,” he said.

Younker explained the purpose of a signed contract is to detail the responsibilities and terms and conditions of employment.

“We did recommend that this should be documented,” he said.

Opposition Leader Olive Crane came to the P.E.I. Energy Corporation’s defence, pointing out the capital projects were built on time and under budget.

“The person who did the design and management had quite a bit of experience in wind energy and was involved in the Atlantic Wind Test Site for a number of years,” Younker said.

“But he should have signed contracts and documents.”

Stratford MLA Cynthia Dunsford said without proper documentation it’s hard to know whether salaries and budgets were followed.

“It’s called competitive for a reason – the price could come in a bit lower than budget,” she told the committee.

“In this case we don’t know whether or not that would have happened.”

Younker said the major contracts were approved by Executive Council. The problems with the hiring discrepancies occurred because of a misunderstanding by the Energy Corporation.

“A big part of the problem here was that the people at the corporation weren’t aware that they were under the Treasury Board policy.”

The auditor general’s office sent a followup letter and made recommendations in the report asking the corporation to seek direction from Treasury Board in the future.

“And then as far as contracts being signed by both parties – they followed up on all the recommendations that we’ve made,” Younker said.

The committee will meet again Feb. 12 to continue combing through the report.

By Teresa Wright

The Guardian

23 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.