LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind zoning OK'd in Union 

UNION TWP. – Wind energy development zoning regulations now are official for the township.

Union Twp. Trustees met Thursday night to decide whether to accept either of two proposed zoning amendments – one from the township zoning commission and the other from Union Neighbors United – township residents concerned about wind development zoning issues.

Trustees Jim Virts and Howard Peters approved the zoning commission amendment and rejected the Union Neighbors proposal. Trustee Douglas Hurst recused himself from the meeting to avoid a possible conflict of interest. He is on the board of directors for Pioneer Rural Electric, which could have an interest in wind energy development.

“We respect the opposition, and if the state comes up with better and clearer regulations, we’ll take those,” Peters said.

The accepted regulations include:

• A wind turbine must be at least 1,000 feet from a primary structure.

• Turbines must be set back at least 1.2 times the height of the tower from an adjacent property line or road right-of ways.

• A turbine cannot be more than 500 feet tall.

The rejected proposal’s regulations included a minimum 2,600-foot setback from adjoining property and primary structures, a minimum setback of four times the height of the turbine from road right-of-ways, a maximum height at 300 feet and specified regulations on vibrations, shadow and noise levels.

About 50 people attended the meeting, and nine chose to voice opinions before the vote.

By Natalie Morales
Staff Writer

Springfield News-Sun

17 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky