[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

No wind turbines in parks, FPL says  

Bowing to public pressure, Florida Power & Light Co. has dropped its plan to put 400-foot-tall wind turbines on public, waterfront parks, company officials said Wednesday.

Instead, it wants to build three on land owned by the state and the South Florida Water Management District and six on FPL property at the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant.

Use of the county-operated beach access areas at John Brooks and Frederick Douglass parks has been a major complaint of windturbine project critics who also question the aesthetics, noise and effects on wildlife.

“We want to be good neighbors,” FPL spokeswoman Sharon Bennett said of the amended plans the company submitted to the county on Wednesday.

Critics say moving the project from county parks is an improvement, but they’re not convinced the project is for St. Lucie County.

Indian River Drive resident Sandy Steinruck said she’s still concerned the wind turbine construction will damage valuable wildlife habitat.

“We’ve seen in Colorado the damage and the mess they create,” she said.

County Commissioners Doug Coward and Paula Lewis said they’re glad the company has moved from John Brooks and Frederick Douglass parks, but want more information about the public land north of Blind Creek. Both want to know how and why the state and water district acquired the property.

“If they’re using land acquired for conservation purposes, the problem hasn’t gone away,” Coward said. “It’s just not appropriate to use conservation land and there are still unanswered questions.”

“It’s encouraging they’ve accepted the fact the county beaches just won’t work as windmill sites,” Lewis said. “A lot of opponents simply don’t want windmills and this won’t satisfy them.”

County Commission Chairman Joe Smith said the change doesn’t necessarily clear the way for the wind turbines to be built.

“Some said they object to a private company using any public land,” Smith said.

The public property is undeveloped and the state agencies support the project, Bennett said.

“We have to put in a road and clear the land for the windmill,” Bennett said. “If the owners want us to create more public beach access, we can do that. If they want us to re-plant the property, we can do that,” she said.

Jane Brooks, whose late husband worked for the state to buy the park that bears his name, said she’s thrilled FPL won’t use that property.

“I thought it would have set a dangerous precedent to put any kind of development on public property that was bought for preservation and conservation,” Brooks said.

County Commissioner Chris Craft, primary backer of the project, was quoted in FPL’s news release as saying he appreciates the company “responding to the public to balance the need for alternative energy with our right to enjoy public spaces.”

The nine wind turbines could generate up to 20.7 megawatts “under favorable wind conditions” and power 3,000 houses, FPL says.

FPL’s new proposal

# Six wind turbines, instead of five, on Florida Power & Light Co. property at its nuclear power plant.

# Three wind turbines on land owned by the state and South Florida Water Management District instead of at John Brooks and Frederick Douglass parks.

What’s next

# St. Lucie County commissioners must consider FPL’s request to rezone the public property to allow wind turbines.

By Jim Reeder
Staff Writer

Palm Beach Post

17 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.