LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

We don't want new windfarm 

Campaigners are welcoming objections from Cumbria County Council against plans for a controversial windfarm on the edge of the Lake District.

Berrier Hill Wind Energy Ltd is proposing to put up nine 100-metre high turbines – around 335ft – at Berrier Hill on the Greystoke Castle Estate.

The turbines would be seen in panoramic views dominated by the backdrop fells of Blencathra, Carrock and Bowscale.

The proposals have already prompted hundreds of responses to Eden Council’s planning office – around 375 supporting the application and 400 against, according to figures from mid-December.

Parish councils, residents and statutory groups such as county archeologists are among those who have raised concerns.

Now the county council’s development control panel has lodged an objection following the recommendation of Shaun Gorman, the head of environment.

He told the council panel that the windfarm would have a significant effect on the landscape and character of the area, which provides the setting for the nearby Lake District National Park.

In particular, Mr Gorman was concerned about the impact it would have on landscape, the lack of information on whether the local road network could accommodate the planned development and the lack of work to record, protect and conserve archaeological remains.

He also says the plans do not fit in with five key planning policies.

County councillors on the development control panel agreed with Mr Gorman’s report and submitted it to Eden’s planning department as part of the statutory consultation.

A spokesman for the Berrier Hill Wind Farm Opposition Group said: “This is fantastic news for the beginning of 2008, and reinforces what we’ve always said from the very beginning, that this is an unsuitable place for an industrial windfarm development.

“We’ve always argued this is a very special unspoilt area of outstanding natural beauty which forms the setting for Blencathra – one of the most famous mountains in the Lake District – and the windfarm would have a disproportionate effect on the landscape of this quiet backwater.

“We’re heartened that this exceptional landscape has been recognised by Cumbria County Council and we’re delighted the proposed Berrier Hill windfarm is contrary to five county planning policy documents.”

The group’s statement adds: “This strengthens our opposition to Berrier Hill windfarm and we’re confident that taken together with objections from other statutory and non-statutory bodies Eden District Council will now have to reject the planning application or face a legal challenge in the court.”

Eden Council planners are expected to consider the nine-turbine application this Spring, possibly April.

On Thursday, Eden planners are being asked to decide whether a 150ft mast can be erected at the Berrier site. Planning officers have recommended permission be granted for the anemometer mast, to measure wind speed.

The application has been made by Berrier Hill Wind Energy, a subsidiary of Flintshire-based West Coast Energy Ltd, the company which brought the controversial Whinash windfarm proposal, which was eventually turned down after a public enquiry.

Berrier Hill Wind Energy Ltd, which is assessing the viability of the land for power generation, says the mast is necessary to collect wind data to predict long term average wind speeds.

If permission for the mast is granted it would last for a limited period of three years.

News & Star

15 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky