[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windfarm back on agenda  

Controversial plans for a windfarm near Darrington are back on the agenda after a decision to block a monitoring mast was overturned.

Developers Banks Ltd appealed to the planning inspectorate after Wakefield planners rejected its application for a 60m wind monitoring mast on land next to Westfield Lane – seen as a precursor to a further application for a six-turbine windfarm.

The decision last July was hailed a victory for the campaigners who voted in their hundreds against the plan, but this week planning inspector Philip Major approved the application. In his report, he acknowledged the objections and said: “The many representations received covered a large number of matters, though many of these addressed the possibility of wind farm development and not the proposal before me.”

He disagreed with objectors that the monitoring mast would cause a distraction to drivers on the A1 or that it would harm wildlife, but stated that the application conflicted with the council’s unitary development plan (UDP) and there would be a degree of harm to the landscape.

Mr Major said the mast must be removed within three years and some archeological surveys should be carried out before the mast was built.

Campaigners against the windfarm had a public meeting on Tuesday night. Tony Hames, chairman of Pontefract Wind Farm Action Group (PWAG) said:

“We are going to try and step up our campaign against the windfarm plan now. We are arranging a meeting with all parish and district councillors in the surrounding area. Although we can’t appeal against this latest decision, we are going to register our disappointment that the government hasn’t supported the local authority.

“We are pleased that inspector put in his report that the one mast would have an impact on the landscape.”

Pontrefract & Castleton Express

10 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.