[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind turbines rejected 

A “potentially disastrous situation” was avoided by planning officials today after they refused proposals for new wind turbines following complaints from the Ministry of Defence.

When plans for six new 120m high turbines at Swaffham were first unveiled Breckland Council recommended approval for the scheme.

But after councillors put off making a final decision on the project-between the A1065 Castle Acre Road and Sporle-to allow more investigation of issues raised by the MoD, the plans were recommended for refusal.

Defence Estates had concerns over the impact of the turbines on air traffic radar and air traffic management procedures at RAF Marham.

However Next Generation tried to get conditions imposed to overcome concerns, which the MoD said would be “unreasonable and as such unenforceable.”

David Williams, councillor for the area, said: “I’ve served in the RAF for 23 years and spent some of my time at Marham. The turbines mean air craft would go off radar for around five miles.

“What you’re proposing is to take part of the busiest air craft station in the UK off radar. It’s a ticking time bomb. Do you really want a time bomb in your hands?

“If an aircraft goes down in that area it’s not just the pilot that will get hurt. It’s a potentially disastrous situation. These turbines create a lot of power. Great. But let them do it at sea.”

Councillors on Breckland’s development control committee unanimously refused the plans.

Wind turbine companies have previously accused the MoD of being “the biggest single obstacle to wind power in the UK”.

By Robyn Greenacre

Eastern Daily Press

14 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon