[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind-power politics — locals push for land-use control  

About six months after Mark McClain moved to Kittitas County, he was driving to work when he saw a neighbor struggling to get an uncooperative cow to go through a fence. Although McClain was wearing a suit, he jumped out of the car and helped out.

That’s one example of the small-community feel that McClain cherishes, and part of the reason he’s concerned about managing the region’s growth as a county commissioner.

Key to managing that growth, he said, is maintaining local land-use control – which is why he’s unhappy about a state decision to override the Kittitas County Commission and allow the Kittitas Valley Wind Power project to be sited near Ellensburg.

A state energy-siting panel recommended that Gov. Chris Gregoire approve the project, which she did on Sept. 18. The county has appealed that decision, and the case will likely head to the state Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, the Desert Claim wind power project has also applied to the state body, the Energy Facility Siting Evaluation Council, for precedence over local decision makers.

Kittitas County is at the epicenter of wind-energy development in the state for two reasons: It’s got powerful winds and easy access to transmission lines that can carry electricity west over the mountains to the Puget Sound area, where there’s lots of demand for power.

McClain said he and the other commissioners are not opposed to wind power. The commission already welcomed the Wild Horse wind project, which was built in a remote part of the county and faced far less local opposition. And this summer, the commissioners created a 500-square-mile overlay zone in the eastern part of the county that they identified as suitable for wind-farm development. Developers who want to put a project there would have streamlined permitting.

McClain said that having wind farms in the county generates property-tax revenue for school districts and other services that were hurt by tax-cutting Initiatives 695 and 747. For example, with the Wild Horse project, permit fees alone were a significant source of revenue.

But in the case of the Kittitas Valley and Desert Claim projects, he doesn’t think the state siting panel should recommend overruling locals.

“What I think this demonstrates is (the panel) overstepping its bounds,” he said. “Our planning staff is more than capable of siting projects like these.”

By Dierdre Gregg
Staff Writer

Puget Sound Business Journal

28 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.