[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Committee finishes first year of wind energy pursuit  

The Jamestown Wind Energy Committee spent its final meeting of the year looking at an initial draft request for qualifications (RFQ) to find a consultant for a wind power feasibility study. The request, scheduled to be announced in January, is a result of the committee’s determination that Jamestown has viable wind resources to generate energy, and that professional advice is needed to create the means.

The wind committee spent most of its Dec. 18 meeting in review of the request, which will solicit proposals from architectural and wind energy firms. Proposals are expected to offer the committee professional services that can help provide a detailed study for possible wind power generation.

Committee members discussed specifying a number of sites to evaluate. Concern was brought up about whether the number of sites requested to be identified would affect how much money was dedicated to exploring each site. They agreed the study should include identifying and ranking the top 10 or more sites suitable for analysis.

Chairman Don Wineberg hinted that decisions on how many sites to examine could be made after proposals were submitted. “If the proposals come in beyond our budgets, then we can cut back. I think we know Jamestown better than the consultants do, so we can help to direct them towards possible sites,” he said. To date, the committee has been allocated $25,000 by the Town Council towards wind power investigation.

The committee created its own list of possible sites for wind turbines last month. Committee member Bob Bowen pointed out that the top five sites marked by committee members were “strong” possibilities, and the second five sites, totaling ten, were significantly weaker possibilities. “They’re being hired to be our consultants, to work together though this with the committee,” Bowen said about potential bidders.

In outlining the four stages of the process, the committee also agreed the public should become involved when the first list of sites from stage one is formed. “The difference between the first and second stage is the qualifying and narrowing of choices,” Committee member Clayton Carlisle noted. “After stage one, we can recommend doing a more detailed analysis on two or three (sites).” Consultants should include presentations at public hearings in their bids, Wineberg added.

In the bid request, the committee will ask consultants for a scope of work and a completion date of the study. The RFQ is expected to be finalized and publicly posted by the end of January. Wineberg targeted spring of 2008 for completion of the feasibility study.

The wind study so far

The project to produce sustainable energy began over a year ago when two independent groups of local residents met to explore the possibility of generating electricity from wind on the island. The investigations were spurred by the town’s rising electricity costs and “carbon footprint” associated with burning fossil fuels and natural gas. A carbon footprint, a phrase coined in British media in recent years, refers to the amount of carbon dioxide that is emitted into the environment by a person or industry.

Wineberg remembered his own interest was sparked on a sail around Jamestown. When the boat passed Fort Getty, one crew member suggested it would be “a great place” to put wind generators. Wineberg informally mentioned it to the Town Council. “They seemed enthusiastic about it,” he added. The committee was formed by the council last April, with an initial budget of $10,000 to start the ball rolling.

As the committee did its research, it quickly realized that a comprehensive study was in order. With an encouraging nod from the energy resources office at the state level, the committee made a presentation to the council early in the fall, and the council approved an additional $15,000 to be spent on a wind turbine feasibility study. About the same time, state energy advisor Andrew Dzykewicz told the committee that a wind energy program would be appropriate for both the island and the state.

Wineberg mentioned that all of the consultants he has met so far have said aesthetics is the number one issue. Aesthetics include close and far views, possible noise pollution, and shadow flicker from turning blades. The panel harbors a worry that people may not want windmills near their homes. Wineberg was pleased to add, however, that no complaints from residents have been heard. “We have not received one critical comment yet about placing wind power in Jamestown. I hope worries about NIMBYism are wrong,” Wineberg said.

Wineberg went on to say that he did not foresee money as being a problem in developing wind power generators. Additionally, a number of developers introduced themselves, saying that projects of one, two or three turbines are much easier to get built than big farms. “There are lots of tax incentives. This is a Jamestown project, and the town is healthy financially.”

Another obstacle will be to get a good net metering law, so the town gets a fair price for the electricity. Under net metering, excess electricity produced by the wind turbine will spin the existing home or business electricity meter backwards, effectively banking the electricity until it is needed by the customer. This provides the customer with full retail value for all the electricity produced, according to the American Wind Energy Association.

The committee exudes confi- dence that they are on track for meeting their initial goals. “We made a decision early on to do our work thoroughly and well,” Wineberg said. “We are as deliberate as possible. Our job is to engage in a process and not to accomplish goals at this point. The quality of the process that we’ve engaged in makes sure the process is defensible and transparent.” Wineberg explained that the committee is exhausting a list of possible questions that may arise in order to have accurate and detailed information for the town.

Committee members all feel they are working well and close to their own expectations. Some members have expressed regret that, due to conflicting schedules, collaboration with the Conservation Commission has been difficult. The two boards regularly share information, however, and plan to hold at least one joint meeting in the next few months.

The wind committee says the upcoming year is going to be an exciting one, learning about all the possible sites and making recommendations to the town. “I look forward to the day when we are worrying about delivery for blades, maybe by 2012,” Wineberg said.

By Michaela Kennedy

The Jamestown Press

28 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.