[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Del. puts wind power deal on hold; Citing cost concerns, lawmakers block vote  

State lawmakers have blocked an offshore wind power contract, forcing a deadlock among four state agencies and relegating the project to an uncertain fate.

The Public Service Commission and three other state agencies were expected to vote on the contract Tuesday, ending a yearlong process initiated after lawmakers ordered them to explore ways to stabilize energy prices. After ruling out alternatives, regulators earlier this year asked Bluewater Wind LLC and Delmarva Power to negotiate a contract.

But the very lawmakers who orchestrated the negotiations shut them down, at least temporarily.

House Speaker Terry Spence, R-Stratford, said he was concerned about the cost of the project, $1 billion to construct 150 turbines off the coast of Rehoboth Beach.

“I have a feeling, in talking with other elected officials, that the possibility of a huge expense down the road, long-term, was one of the reasons why there was some hesitation, and it’s probably why it’s been tabled,” Spence said.

He hoped the matter could be resolved in the next 30-60 days, he said. “I think everyone wants to step back and look at everything, and see if there’s additional information that we may be able to come up with to make a solid decision on what we should do.”

Before Tuesday’s meeting, the heads of the four agencies in charge of voting on the contract met privately but were unable to agree on how to spread the cost for the wind power. One no vote would kill the project. Controller General Russ Larson, a voting member who answers to legislative leaders, was instructed to spread the costs statewide, beyond Delmarva Power customers.

But the other agency heads – from the Public Service Commission, Management and Budget, and Natural Resources and Environmental Control – would not agree to his conditions, which would have required legislative intervention, a major hurdle. The agency heads then met publicly with the Public Service Commission and voted to table the proposal. They pledged to keep talking but are under no obligation to bring the proposal back.

“This reflects there are significant issues with this proposal that still need to be addressed,” Delmarva spokesman Bill Yingling said. “We’re willing to work with all the parties involved to reach the best solution for our customers.”

Jim Lanard, spokesman for developer Bluewater Wind, said his group is ready to begin discussions with legislative leaders in an effort to forge an agreement.

‘The old boys’ network’

After Tuesday’s meeting at Wesley College, about 30 frazzled environmental activists met to discuss alternatives. Some said they were ready to begin a wider campaign to rally support.

Betty Deacon, who retired to Lewes last year, called it a sad day for Delaware.

“Since I’ve lived here, I’ve learned more and more about the old boys’ network,” said Deacon, who spent nine years as state director for Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md. “Two or three or four people control the state Legislature. I think that’s appalling.”

A “yes” vote Tuesday by all four agencies would have required Delmarva to sign a 25-year contract to buy wind power from Bluewater. That contract would have allowed Bluewater to start the permitting process for the wind farm.

The proposed contract would have applied only to Delmarva residential and small-business customers. A Public Service Commission consultant identified the average monthly price increase to a residential customer as about $6.50. One alternative proposal would have spread the costs to all Delmarva customers, including big businesses, which would have cut the monthly increase to $3.37. Other estimates of the cost, including those from a consultant hired by Delmarva, put it as high as $21 to $34 a month.

But it was a second alternative that caused the biggest dissent among the voting agencies. Larson said lawmakers wanted to explore having all Delaware electric users, including customers of the state’s smaller utilities, pay for the wind power.

This would have cut the average monthly increase to $2.24, according to PSC analysts, but would have required legislative approval, which observers said would have been difficult. Opponents of the wind farm occupy key posts in the Legislature.

“Admittedly, I probably had more issues than everybody else, but everyone had issues,” Larson said.

Questions remain

Public interest in the project has been overwhelming, particularly in Sussex County, he said. But he noted that a large number of those southern Delaware customers did not use Delmarva. He was referring to the Delaware Electric Cooperative, a small utility not included in the Delmarva contract.

Rep. Gregory F. Lavelle, R-Sharpley, said there were still “a lot of unanswered questions. It’s a tremendous risk that really the Delmarva customer base is shouldering for the benefit of the entire state.”

Senate President Pro Tem Thurman G. Adams Jr., D-Bridgeville, said many questions about the project remain unanswered. He said the General Assembly needs to review and decide on the issue.

“The monkey’s on our back to go forward, if we’re going to do something,” Adams said.

Another voting member, Jennifer Davis of the Office of Management and Budget, also wanted to give more thought to spreading the costs statewide, said Bert Scoglietti, the office’s director of policy and external affairs.

None of the four voting groups was prepared to kill the project, said DNREC Secretary John Hughes, but none wants to see the issue drag on indefinitely. He said he’d like to see a resolution by spring.

“Nobody wants to see Bluewater subjected to death by a thousand cuts,” said Hughes, a project supporter. “In the near term, now through June, I expect the issue will be debated in the Legislature to some degree. I’d be surprised if we got through the legislative session without both sides lobbying.”

PSC Chairwoman Arnetta McRae could not be reached for comment.

Larson said discussions would probably pause until the legislative session begins next month.

Lanard, of Bluewater, called it “a temporary halt to a march to the finish line. Consider it a timeout, at the two-minute warning, and we’re about to go into the endgame here. We are confident we can get this project across the goal line, but we need to huddle with the key legislators to help us understand what modifications they would like to our proposal.”

The yearlong discussion about the wind farm has given rise to a grass-roots environmental movement in Delaware. And after the meeting, those activists converged in private to determine their next steps.

Tom Noyes, whose Tommywonk blog is widely read among Delaware environmentalists, expressed optimism the issues could be worked out.

“We’ve got the facts on our side, we’ve got the law on our side, we’ve got public sentiment on our side. Now we just have to get talking to our legislators,” Noyes said.

By Aaron Nathans

News Journal

19 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter