[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Big obstacles to little R.I.'s wind power goals  

New England needs new electricity sources and has some of the highest electricity rates in the nation. Wind is free and abundant along the coastline. And unlike fossil fuels, wind turbines do not produce the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

All of those factors were behind Rhode Island Gov. Donald L. Carcieri’s setting a goal of getting 15 percent of the state’s electrical power from wind by 2011, which would require about 100 turbines.

Major challenges stand in the way of the small state’s big plans.

Among them: No one has decided where to put a wind farm, it’s not clear how the project will be paid for, and public opposition – a major wild card – is unknown, according to Carcieri’s top energy adviser, Andrew Dzykewicz.

Still, Dzykewicz is hopeful Rhode Island will be getting a large portion of its energy from wind by sometime after 2012.

Hoping to stabilize electricity costs and increase supply, Carcieri in January 2006 announced an energy plan that eventually included measures such as using hydropower, reforming the state’s electric market, reducing state government’s energy consumption and promoting the use of wind power. Later, he said he thought the state could reach the wind goal around the time his term ends in 2011.

This spring, his administration proposed building about 100 offshore wind turbines in Narragansett Bay, enough to power about 175,000 homes. There is only one major wind turbine in the state, at Portsmouth Abbey, a monastery and school.

Wind power generates less than one megawatt of electricity in Rhode Island, a tiny blip compared with the national leader, Texas, which has enough wind turbines to churn out almost 4,000 megawatts, according to the American Wind Energy Association, an industry group.

While Carcieri’s administration has made some progress, it has been slow going. “We won’t have the blades turning by the time he’s gone,” Dzykewicz said.

Dzykewicz said he expects the state could have an offshore wind farm in five to seven years. But even that might be too optimistic.

Across the border in Massachusetts, opponents of a plan to build 130 wind turbines off Cape Cod in Nantucket Sound have stymied the Cape Wind project for more than six years because of fears that it could spoil views of the water and be a hazard for boats.

With fishing and tourism also key industries in Rhode Island, a similar proposal could face similar opposition here.

No other state has built an offshore wind farm, forcing Rhode Island to invent the process nearly from scratch. One of the state’s main environmental regulatory bodies, the Coastal Resources Management Council, has not even decided what it requires from prospective wind power developers.

The state also hasn’t settled on where to put wind turbines.

Earlier this year, Dzykewicz’s office assembled a panel of wind power advocates, environmentalists and others to whittle down the list of promising locations. It met four times, then decided it did not have enough information to make any decisions.

Panel members including Matt Auten, an advocate for Environment Rhode Island, a nonprofit group that lobbies for tighter anti-pollution rules, praised Carcieri for seeking community input, but they said picking wind farm sites is impossible until they know the environmental impact.

“The ‘where’ question is very important” if Carcieri wants to avoid Cape Wind-like delays, Auten said.

That question now falls to Dzykewicz, who said his office will probably try to get permits for several areas and see which are acceptable to regulators.

Permitting alone will take at least two years, Dzykewicz said. Once permits are secured, Carcieri’s office must find a developer and backers to build and fund the project, a process expected to take several months.

At least two developers and several finance firms have said they are interested.

In September, New York-based Allco Renewable Energy Group, a wind power development firm, proposed building up to 338 wind turbines off Westerly, Block Island and Little Compton. The firm expects it could build the project by 2010 or 2011, said Jim Wavle, Allco’s managing director.

“It can happen, without a doubt, but it’s up to the state and the stakeholders to either embrace this or not,” he said.

Developer Bluewater Wind has also signaled interest. But before going forward, it would have to show investors it has a long-term contract with a utility willing to buy its power, said Erich Stephens, who is heading the Rhode Island project.

“The problem in New England, in part, is that there’s been no utility that’s willing to step up to the plate,” he said.

Some wind power advocates have pushed for lawmakers to force electricity distributors such as National Grid, the state’s dominant distributor, to buy renewable energy at a premium. A National Grid spokesman said the firm supports renewable energy, but it believes too much is uncertain to make promises now.

Carcieri’s office tried to move forward by asking state lawmakers to approve the Rhode Island Power Authority, a government entity authorized to buy renewable energy and sell it to customers.

Lawmakers declined, saying they had concerns about making the state a power dealer, said Larry Berman, a spokesman for House Speaker William Murphy. He said they might revisit the idea in January.

Associated Press

Baltimore Sun

16 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.