[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Storm of protest over wind farms  

Green campaigners have welcomed Government plans for up to 7,000 wind turbines around the British coast.

However, fishermen said the proposals could have a huge impact on their industry in the Thames Estuary.

The proposals announced by business secretary John Hutton could mean about two offshore turbines for every mile of the coastline.

Ministers hope to reduce their reliance on countries such as Russia for their energy needs and want 20 per cent of Britain’s energy needs to come from renewable energy sources by 2020.

However, there will have to be other sources, such as a new generation of nuclear power stations, including a possible one at Bradwell, near Maldon.

Prominent south Essex green campaigner Irene Willis said she was greatly in favour of wind turbines as a renewable energy source, but recognised they were still quite unpopular with the public.

She said: “Wind turbines are one of the most unpopular of the renewables and cause a lot of emotions because they can be dominant in the landscape.

“But I think if they were put in place, they would soon be accepted as part of the landscape and seascape by people opposed to them.

“I suspect the Government is doing this just to promote their own plan for more nuclear power stations. There will be a lot of opposition to this proposal, which will mean the nuclear option can be pushed even more.”

However, the plan has been deeply unpopular with fishermen.

Southend trawlerman Glyn Gilson said: “It will mean we will lose more of our fishing grounds, which will mean more pressure on the industry.

“We have already lost a considerable amount of fishing ground because of the turbines at Whitstable and, from what I have heard, they are not working reliably or proving a cheap way of producing energy.”

Southend Council deputy leader John Lamb said he too had reservations about the Gov- ernment proposals.

Mr Lamb, who is also chairman of the Kent and Essex Sea Fisheries Committee, said: “The North Sea would be a good area for the turbines as there is usually a reasonable amount of wind.

“But I am concerned they are not particularly attractive, nor has it been shown they are totally efficient.

“All the consequences would need to be looked at before the Government goes ahead with proposals of this magnitude.”

By Geoff Percival


11 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.