LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Town of Malone wants say in area wind ordinances 

The Town of Malone Council wants to be heard when it comes to wind tower ordinances in neighboring communities.

At Wednesday’s town board meeting, Councilman Jack Sullivan noted that Burke is working on an ordinance that would regulate wind tower development proposed for the town.

“The draft ordinance says towers have to be at least 1,320 feet from any house,” Sullivan said. “I don’t know where the towers are going to be located, but, theoretically, they could be one foot from the Malone town line.”

Though Burke has since changed the draft ordinance to extend the setback to 1,400 feet, Sullivan says Malone is hoping for more.

“We’d like to see a mile,” Sullivan said in an interview Sunday. “It’s based mostly on research from Europe. That’s a safe distance so you don’t get adverse health effects on people – migraine disorders or seizures in people who are susceptible to them.”

At Wednesday’s meeting, the town board agreed to send letters to the towns of Bellmont and Burke asking to be informed on progress with the towns’ respective wind ordinances and asking to be notified of any pending public hearings on the regulations.

The board previously sent a similar letter to the town of Brandon.

“I’d hate to see someone’s property value drop 20 to 50 percent, and, because they don’t live in the town with the towers, they would have no say,” Sullivan said. “As far as I’m concerned, that’s taking away someone’s property without due process.”

Deputy Town Supervisor Paul Walbridge said he knows of at least one individual – a town resident – who is concerned about a possible wind farm located in a neighboring town.

“He lives right on the town line,” Walbridge said. “He’s worried about what this could do to his property.”

Sullivan also noted Sunday that he is studying reports detailing the energy production of existing wind energy facilities.

“I’ve been working on production numbers from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,” he said. “The efficiencies of the ones that are in working order – like in the Tug Hill Plateau area – are very low – less than 25 percent.”

Sullivan said detailed reports – which he described as lengthy – are available on the FERC Web site at www.ferc.gov.

By Darcy Fargo

The Telegram

3 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky