[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Few benefit from wind farms  

Whoa, why are Paul Jacobs comments so personal? At no time have I ever personally criticized him or any of the other wind farm participating land owners. They made the choice for their property.

The point I make is that if one rents or leases land for custom farming it doesn’t cost me or any other county resident anything for that custom farmer’s combine or its repair or the fuel that goes into it and the landowner collects the payments. However, if wind turbines are constructed there become extra costs incurred by the county, for reasons that have been mentioned in previous articles, which will be passed onto the taxpayers over time with no benefit to our energy costs, and landowners will still collect payment. Mr. Jacobs mentioned that my column was to “discredit the positive aspects about wind farms,” but then he failed to list any of those aspects.

Look, I barely know Mr. Jacobs other than who he is and that he is a wind farm participant. I’m just a John Q. Public guy who lives in rural Stephenson County, I’m a working stiff that pays my taxes, putting my kids through school and trying to make each day better than the day before. Yes, I have strong opinions about the wind farm issue, not that I believe wind energy is good or bad, rather that the whole episode has been handled so wrongly. Thirteen months ago I had no opinion at all, then I attended a Zoning Board of Appeals hearing and could not believe the audacity of the supporters and participants toward those who objected.

Then eleven months ago I was part of a group of residents from both Lancaster and Waddams townships that drafted a compromising plan for proper and safe zoning setbacks of wind turbines with property protection for neighboring residents.

When that proposal was presented to the county’s Plan Commission it was rejected with one board member making the comment “we don’t owe these people anything,” I guess forgetting that “these people” are tax paying citizens? Since that time the county’s zoning laws and ordinances have been eliminated and modified to suit only those who support the plan. It is that kind of disrespect that has led to my stance today.

Tom Moyer


The Journal-Standard

3 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.