[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Farm Inquiry Day 11 — AM  

Closing statements were given by the Ministry of Defence for their ‘strongest possible opposition’ to the proposal of the Middlemoor Wind Farm in North Charlton.

At the public inquiry this morning, the Ministry of Defence gave their closing statements as to why they oppose to the erection of an 18-turbine wind farm.

They said: “The Ministry of Defence expresses its strongest possible opposition to this proposal.

“The one and only basis of its opposition if that this proposal will have a serious adverse effect on the operation an effectiveness of the Air Defence Radar System of the United Kingdom through its effect upon the radar at Brizlee Wood.”

The Ministry of Defence also submitted a condition to the inquiry, that, should the wind farm proposal be approved by inspector Alan Novitzky, the ultimate decision on the erection of the wind farm should lie with the Air Officer of Battleship movement, who is described as the “person best capable of making the judgement as to the effect upon the efficacy on the air defence system caused by the proposed development”.

However, Marcus Trinnick opposed this condition stating that legally it is the Secretary of State for Business who makes this ultimate decision, and power cannot be delegate to another person. He added that the Secretary of State could consult the MOD making his decision.

Speaking on behalf of the MOD Mr Cotterill referred to a previous case in the 1979 Journal of Planning Law, when stating that if the Secretary of State did consult with the MOD, and this consultation was over-ridden the result would be unacceptable as it would not give due weight to the national security implications that would follow as a result of the consultation.

And if the Secretary of State was to object to the development on the basis of the consultation this would also be unacceptable because the decision would be delegating decision making to somebody else.

By Helen Woods

Northumberland Gazette

29 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.