[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Farm Inquiry Day 6 — Morning  

Windfam development would have “unacceptable landscape and visual impacts” – that is the view of a chartered member of The Landscape Institute.

Speaking at day six of the Middlemoor inquiry, on behalf on Alnwick District Council, Krystina Campbell expressed that, in her opinion, the Planning Inspectorate should refuse the appeal.

Miss Campbell, who in her evidence was covering the landscape and visual impact of the proposal on the study area, said: “The Development would have unacceptable landscape and visual impacts on the Charlton Ridge, adverse impacts on the North-east Coastal Plain, and a locally designated Area of High Landscape value.”

She also pointed to the ‘significant impact’ that the development would have on key iconic views including from Bamburgh Castle and Ros Castle and unacceptable impacts on areas such as Hulne Park Registered park.

Her evidence also considered the cumulative impact of Middlemoor and Wandylaw windfarms which has since been rejected by Berwick Borough Council.

She said: “These two proposals would substantially reduce the landscape quality and value of the Northumberland Sandstone hills and appear as one contiguous development that will change the landscape character of the Charlton Ridge, so that it would appear as a ‘windfarm landscape’.

But Marcus Trinick, advocate for npower, hit back. He said: “If you are looking at the cumulative impact of Middlemoor and not Wandylaw then you assume a baseline of nothing.

“You are taking the wrong approach to cumulative assessment by assuming that Middlemoor is there and adding Wandylaw to it.”

He also highlighted that the montages which were used in evidence showing artist impressions of the turbines did not give a full picture of the proposed windfarm as a hole when taken from a wider aspect.

He said: “If we were using sensitivity of people then that sensitivity would vary.”

Of one of the montages showing the view from Craster he said: “The road heading south west from Craster village is difficult to make a judgement from because of the trees, it is not visible.”

But Miss Campbell replied saying: “It gives an overall sensitivity. In this specific case the area is endorsed with sensitive receptors meaning people and iconic views.”

The cross examination continued this afternoon.

Northumberland Gazette

21 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.