[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Gulliver shut down for safety precaution  

A lightning strike on the Lowestoft wind turbine has resulted in it being out of action for the past four weeks, it emerged yesterday.

Although it suffered damage in a storm during the summer it has now been discovered that it has suffered minor damage to one of the tips and has been shut down for safety reasons.

The giant 120-metre landmark, known as Gulliver, was hit during the thunderstorm on June 8.

Engineers had the blades spinning again the same day, but a maintenance inspection last month uncovered the problem.

The turbine, capable of powering 1,600 homes, will remain closed until specialised equipment can be brought in to bring the blade down to ground level for repairs.

Lowestoft energy company SLP Engineering developed the turbine in 2004 and still holds its maintenance contract.

The company’s communications manager Kerry-Leigh Gauntt, said: “This is the fourth week the turbine has been offline.

“Due to the nature of the blade damage, the repair cannot be completed with the blade in situ.

“The timing of the operation will be dependent on the availability of a suitable crane. To ensure that no further damage is incurred and for safety reasons the turbine will not be operating.”

Gulliver was able to function for months after the bolt struck because of a range of safeguards including lightning receptors in the blade tips and a Faraday cage which catches the electromagnetic pulse to protect the internal circuitry.

It is the country’s tallest onshore wind turbine and was bought by energy company Triodos Renewables for £3.3m in 2006.

The Lowestoft Journal

22 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: