[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbines row set to continue  

A six-year wrangle over plans for two giant wind turbines in Norfolk looks set to drag on as a third public inquiry is to be launched next year.

Residents in Shipdham are to be consulted yet again after the Planning Inspectorate decided to quash a decision to allow the building of the turbines this year.

The permission to put up the 100m wind structures on the site was given on appeal after a second public inquiry last year.

But a condition imposed to prevent noise nuisance was challenged by Nicholas and Lee Hoare who live next to the proposed site.

After reviewing the case, the Planning Inspectorate have now replied, informing the parties involved that a third inquiry will be opened early next year, stressing, however, that the exercise will only discuss noise pollution.

Last night, Brian Kidd, speaking for Campaign against Turbines in Shipdham and Scarning (CATSS) welcomed the decision but expressed his misgivings regarding the fact that the inquiry will be conducted by the original inspector – Chris Gossop.

“The inquiry will focus on technical aspects regarding noise,” Mr Kidd said.

“There is a whole series of issues related to turbines not least the fact that they are intrusive to people’s property, and may be unsafe.

“We have witnessed a huge increase in the number of turbines in the area over the last years. We are worried about the effect on health and other issues which are still under debate,” he added.

The original public inquiry was held in 2003 when the plans were rejected on the basis that more information was needed about the noise the blades would make.

Research was done by noise experts on behalf of developers Ecotricity that showed the turbines would not create a disturbance greater than accepted limits. The findings were presented to Breckland Council in 2004, but permission was rejected on the basis of safety posed to Norwich Airport- a concern already dealt with in the second public inquiry last year.

Geoff Hinchliffe, a long-time Shipdham resident and member of Challenge Against Nimbyism in Shipdham (CANIS) said:

“The decision to hold a third public inquiry is plunging us in limbo again. We are constantly told that if we don’t do something to address global warming and switch to green energy we will be badly affected in the not-too-distant future. We have to realise the dangers and choose alternative sources of energy such as wind turbines or solar power. It’s a shame we are dragging our feet over such an important matter, when we could actually do something useful.”

Neither Dr Lee Hoare, nor Ecotricity would comment.


By Aura Sabadus

Eastern Daily Press

18 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.