[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Firm will appeal on turbines rejection  

Wind farm bosses last night confirmed they would appeal against a council decision to refuse their plans for 10 turbines on the outskirts of Alnwick, and warned it could cost taxpayers up to £250,000 if they win.

NO (wind turbines)Ridgewind Ltd, which wants to build the wind farm at Wandylaw, Chathill, was refused permission for the project last month by councillors, despite their own planning officers recommending approval.

Yesterday the firm said it would be filing its appeal within the next 10 days, claiming councillors formed their decision on misleading presentations from a vocal minority of protesters.

Director Nigel Goodhew said the appeal would cost his company and the council up to £125,000 each, and the council could be saddled with all the costs if planning inspectors rule in Ridgewind’s favour.

Objectors last night said the Northumberland landscape was worth more than the cost of fighting the plans, and repeated their concerns that Ridgewind’s estimates that the wind farm would fuel more than 16,000 homes a year with green energy were flawed.

The site is adjacent to a proposed 18-turbine development at Middlemoor.

It lies within the Berwick Council area, whose planners said the Wandylaw site “would not give rise to significant adverse impacts on the character of the wider or local landscape”.

But last month’s planning committee rejected the bid by a majority of 8-2, ruling that it would have a detrimental effect on the landscape of north Northumberland and expressing fears over the cumulative impact of the Wandylaw and Middlemoor bids.

They also agreed with fears expressed by the Ministry of Defence about the safety of low-flying aircraft – even though planning officials had said the turbines would not affect radar reception.

Yesterday Mr Goodhew said: “We have reviewed the decision with our solicitors, and we are confident that we will prevail on appeal. It is unfortunate that both we and the council must now go through a costly and lengthy legal exercise.

“During the appeal process, we will continue to work hard to counter misleading information about wind farms we have seen recently which only deflect reasoned discussion away from the genuine merits of the project.”

Last night Dominic Coupe, Northumberland chairman of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, who spoke at last month’s meeting, claimed the proposed wind farm would only generate half Ridgewind’s estimated output, adding: “Visitors come to Northumberland to enjoy its beauty, tranquility, wide open space, coastline and castles. They don’t come to see a wind farm.”

Berwick Council director of regeneration and development, Shona Alexander, said: “Both the supporters and the protesters were given the same amount of time (10 minutes) to raise issues about their different views. This is in line with our public speaking policy.

“The applicant was also given a further 10 minutes to make a presentation in favour of the wind farm, which meant that two-thirds of the public speaking time was used to support the application.

“The council has received notification that Ridgewind Ltd is to appeal the decision made by the planning committee.

“They will have to formally appeal to the Planning Inspector who will decide if there is a case to answer.”

By Paul James

The Journal

17 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.