[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind turbine contractor, town remain at odds 

WESTPORT – Three weeks after selectmen signed the contract, the dispute between town officials and the Town Hall wind turbine contractor is no closer to a resolution.

Steve Pitney of Plymouth-based Alternate Energy LLC objects to the town’s plan to pay him in annual installments over 13 years. Town officials have said they are open to other suggestions, but Mr. Pitney is not offering any alternatives.

Instead, Mr. Pitney said he wants to receive the money when he completes the job, rather than in installments. He and other proponents have repeatedly accused selectmen of trying to kill the project. No work has begun.

“I’m considering legal action because they are not negotiating in good faith,” he said.

In response to Mr. Pitney’s latest comments, Town Administrator Michael J. Coughlin said selectmen based their contract on the guarantee he offered.

“The manner in which Mr. Pitney now appears to be backing away from the representations he made before the Board of Selectmen raises the specter of whether these guarantees were ever made in good faith,” Mr. Coughlin said.

During the Oct. 9 selectmen’s meeting, Mr. Pitney guaranteed the town would make back its $18,400 investment in 13 years or he would pay the difference.

Town officials agreed to the 120-foot turbine, at the cost of $63,400, on the condition it receives a $45,000 grant from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative to pay most of the costs.

The town will pay $45,000 to Mr. Pitney once it receives the grant. It will pay the $18,400 in equal installments over a period of 13 years, according to the contract signed by a majority of selectmen.

Town officials wanted the installment plan as a way to ensure the guarantee. Mr. Pitney countered he never had offered what he considers a no-interest financing scheme.

In addition to balking at the installment plan, Mr. Pitney is ruling out a 13-year bond as an alternative because he believes that would add unnecessary costs to the project.

Mr. Coughlin said Mr. Pitney should bring any counter-proposal or suggestions directly to the selectmen.

“It’s highly inappropriate to negotiate this through the media,” he said.

By Brian Boyd
Standard-Times staff writer


14 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky