[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Turbines set to be rejected 

Parachuters at a threatened aerodrome look set to fight off a third attempt to build a wind farm nearby.

Peterlee Parachute Centre fears it would have to stop jumps at its airfield in Shotton Colliery if the go-ahead is given to build two 111-metre tall turbines at Edder Acres farm.

A7 Energy’s original plans were refused in 2005 and a subsequent appeal rejected.

Centre boss Ian Rosenvinge and the British Parachute Association argued it would have meant imposing additional safety restrictions over fears jumpers could be blown into the turbines’ blades, putting the viability of the airfield at risk.

Now Easington District Council’s development control committee will consider a resubmitted application at a meeting on Thursday.

Planning officers have recommended refusal on the grounds that it would jeopardise the future of the airfield, which hosts the only parachute centre between Bridlington and Scotland.

They said: “The information submitted in support of this resubmission is not considered sufficient to overcome the concerns which led to the previous decision made by the council.”

Mr Rosenvinge, an ex-Army skydiver who has invested £750,000 since he bought the airfield in 1996, said he hoped “common sense would prevail” and councillors would reject the scheme.

The application hinges on a risk assessment, which was not in its original proposal.

A7 has claimed the risk to parachutists was previously overstated.

It believes the chances of a jumper whose automatic activation device fires during a problem fall, therefore bringing them to a low level over Edder Acres, would be a “negligible” one-in-25million.

However, Mr Rosenvinge said the risk assessment had been done by people who were not experts in parachuting.

“If it happens over Edder Acres they would die. I can’t take that chance,” he said.

The planning application has also been opposed by Sport England, East Durham Business Service and Durham Bat Group.

Sunderland Echo

10 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky