LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Permission refused again for windfarm 

The party seeking to develop a three turbine wind farm at Sheskin in Bangor has been refused planning permission for a second time, writes Orla Hearns.

TOH Tawnaghmore Windfarm Ltd has been notified of the planning authority’s refusal on October 25 last to grant planning permission.

The applicant had sought to construct the three turbine windfarm together with an 80m high anemometer mast, 4.5m wide access road, a 4.5 m access road to each turbine and a 38 Kv substation. The total height of the turbines on the landscape would have been approximately 100m above ground level.

An identical application from the same applicant had previously been refused by Mayo Co Council on May 22 last. The grounds for refusal related to visual intrusion on the landscape and the impact the development will have on the adjoining Special Areas of Conservation – Carrowmore Lake Complex and Slieve Fyagh Bog.

Submissions were received on the latest application from the National Parks and Wildlife Services, An Taisce and one third party objector.

Having regard to the concerns expressed in the submissions and the objectives of the Mayo Co Development Plan 2003-2009, the planning authority has once again refused planning permission for the development on the grounds that it will interfere with the character of the landscape, which must be preserved. It was also deemed that the windfarm would adversely effect the conservation and preservation of the Carrowmore Lake Complex SAC.

It is not known yet whether this decision will be appealed.

By Orla Hearns

Western People

7 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky