[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

MP defends Crook Hill wind farm stance  

Rochdale MP Paul Rowen has angrily defended his support of Crook Hill campaigners fighting against a proposed wind farm on Crook Hill. Mr Rowen said: “If you want an ‘identikit politician’ who signs up to every line of party policy then I’m not your man.

“I have always been sceptical of the so called benefits of onshore wind farms. I opposed plans for wind farms on Brown Wardle and Knowl Moor back in 1999 and I’ve seen nothing to change my mind. The Prime Minister admitted a couple of weeks ago that the UK’s target of ‘non-renewables’ was unattainable.

Rochdale’s Labour Parliamentary Candidate Simon Danczuk had questioned what he says is a “spectacular u-turn” made by Mr Rowen, on wind farms and renewable energy. Mr Danczuk had said: “Instead of being concerned for the future of Rochdale all he is concerned about is which way the wind is blowing and how he can try and gain some short term popularity.”

Mr Rowen added: “My stance is no different from that of Environment Minister Phil Woolas MP who opposed a similar development on Saddleworth Moor a couple of years ago. We need continuity and certainty of energy supply; you flick a switch and you expect the light to go on. On shore wind supply cannot give you that. This means a greater percentage of conventional power stations have to been retained as a backup. Where do critics stand on nuclear power? Do they back the government’s determination to go nuclear?

“I back totally plans for tidal/wave and offshore wind farms that do guarantee continuity of supplies. We can and should be doing much more to encourage energy conservation though grants repayable through utility bills. Up to 30% of all energy consumed could be saved in this way. We also need to spend much more developing clean coal. Britain has nearly 250 years of coal reserves and sooner or later we are going to have to make use of them. I welcome the opportunity for a lively debate on this topic.”

Rochdale Online

7 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.