[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Invenergy plan won't work  

Invenergy LLC recently submitted a flawed application to the Roxbury Planning Board for a wind plant that would straddle the towns of Roxbury and Stamford. A total of 22 of the proposed 33 industrial wind turbines aren’t valid, due to landowner refusal. David Groberg of Invenergy claims that they will simply build a smaller project _ an unlikely scenario without the connecting property owner’s consent. (http://www.roxburyny.com/windproject/index.html.)

What could the Chicago-based corporation have up its sleeve? Three possibilities are that it:

1. wants the state to invoke eminent domain.

2. believes everyone has his price.

3. is using our community to qualify for tax breaks and to hoodwink investors.

The proposal is dubious because:

It includes parcels belonging to landowners who have said no.

Invenergy claims it will not have to use dynamite. In order to accommodate trucks carrying such large components _ a single turbine blade is 110 feet long _ they will need a wide, flat road. Clearly, they will have to blast the historic ridgeline to create a truck-friendly mesa.

The proposed turbines are made for sea-level, not mountain elevations.

The turbines are louder at the source than the company admits, and will exceed allowable decibel levels at nearby residences.

Invenergy has thwarted a real project: the expansion of the Plattekill Ski Resort, which would create some 600 local jobs. (The investors will not put up the funding if a wind plant will be the view.)

Since the SEQRA process and lawsuits could take several years to complete, I urge the Roxbury board to submit the turbines to a simple sound test. If the turbines fail that test, as they surely will, then why continue to allow this company to toy with our community? Let it ply its tax-avoidance schemes elsewhere.

Kristina Zill


The Daily Star (Oneonta, N.Y.)

7 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.