[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind farm opponents face steep costs if Meridian taken to Environment Court 

Opponents of the Project Hayes wind farm faced a bill of up to $90,000 if they chose to take Meridian Energy to the Environment Court, according to groups that have been through the process.

Consent was given to the energy giant this week to build a 176-turbine wind farm on the Lammermoor Range, south of Ranfurly.

Makara Guardians took Meridian to court over a 70-turbine wind farm that was approved for Wellington’s west coast.

The court upheld that decision but it trimmed four turbines off the original proposal and the height of the turbines was reduced from 125m to about 111m. The cost of the appeal was $89,000, of which $33,000 was covered by legal aid.

Guardians treasurer John Mills said the money was spent bringing in experts in noise pollution, resource consent law and landscape.

“You’ve got to get the very best experts … because you have to be credible. Emotion doesn’t count in court. It’s a dry, factual exercise.” Historian Patrick Parsons , a member of the Outstanding Landscapes Preservation Society, agreed.

The society took Unison Networks to the Environment Court twice over plans to add 37 turbines to a 15-turbine wind farm near Hastings.

“You need expert witnesses to maximise the value of your argument,” he said. The society spent $30,000 on a top solicitor and $15,000 on a resource consent expert.

Each challenge cost the society about $80,000, of which $30,000 was covered by legal aid. The society’s second challenge saw Unison’s approval revoked, a decision the power company is now challenging in the High Court.

Mr Parsons said that although an appeal could be expensive for Project Hayes opponents, it would be heard in front of the right people.

“… When you get to the Environment Court you’re immediately dealing with specialists who aren’t going to have the wool pulled over their eyes.”

By Will Hine

The Southland Times

2 November 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky