[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Councillors override planners  

A group of farmers was given the go-ahead to erect four wind turbines in rural Aberdeenshire yesterday after councillors overruled the advice of planning bosses.

The 295ft windmills, which attracted more than 250 letters of objection during the planning process, had been recommended for refusal because of their height.

But members of the infrastructure services committee decided the negative impact was “pretty marginal” when balanced against the benefits of the project and approved the proposals.

The three individual applicants, known collectively as the Methlick Farmers, were granted approval from the Formartine area committee in June for the four turbines across three sites.

But the project went outwith the limits of Aberdeenshire Council’s local plan and needed to go before the infrastructure services committee for a final decision at Woodhill House in Aberdeen yesterday.

In the report that went before councillors, director of planning and environmental services Christine Gore said the four-turbine development would have “an adverse impact on the character of the area” and an “unacceptable cumulative impact”.

She also said that turbines of 262ft – just 33ft lower than proposed – would have been regarded as acceptable by the council planners.

Speaking in favour of the project at yesterday’s meeting, Paul Johnston, councillor for Mid-Formartine, described the height difference as “pretty marginal” and outlined the benefits a bigger turbine could produce.

He said the extra height would produce a “significant increase in power” and claimed this would consequently result in fewer applications for turbines.

This was backed by Central Buchan councillor Albert Howie who called for “less of them, but bigger machines”.

Some councillors remained unconvinced and warned the project could have a serious impact on the beauty of the surrounding landscape. Committee chairman Martin Ford said he had “never yet voted against a windfarm” but said these applications were “quite challenging”.

He said the height of the turbines was “not a critical issue” but voiced concerns about having numerous turbines of different heights and different rotation cycles within a small area.

“I think a large group of wind turbines is a beautiful sight but I can see having a group of mixed sizes could be injurious to the brain. The visual impact of that would be very different,” he said.

Marcus Humphrey, councillor for Aboyne, Upper Deeside and Donside, reiterated the point and said he was worried about “piecemeal” development of windfarms.

The committee’s vote on the proposals ended with 10 votes in support of the development and four against.

The Press and Journal

5 October 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.