[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbines were on the agenda again  

The pros and cons of building wind turbines near public roads took center-stage at last week’s Grant County Commission meeting.

Attending the meeting were a Grassy Ridge Road couple worried about turbine “ice throws,” plus a pair of representatives from a company erecting the towers.

Grassy Ridge resident Bruce Halgren had previously spoken to commissioners about his concerns over “ice throws.” This is the phenomenon where ice builds up on turbine blades, eventually breaking free and falling to the ground.

At a previous meeting, Halgren told commissioners the state Public Service Commission had barred NedPower and Shell WindEnergy from locating four turbines closer than 820 feet from homes. This step was to protect homes from flying ice.

Halgren believes a similar buffer zone should exist along roadways.

He said one tower is located 117 feet from a roadway, with two others within 200 feet. He said turbine blades from these towers will overhang traffic passing along Grassy Ridge Road.

During a previous meeting with commissioners, Halgren asked officials to look into the issue.

“I just wanted to know where we stand,” Halgren said at last week’s meeting.

Commissioner Jim Wilson said officials made at least a cursory investigation into the issue. Based on information he’s gathered, Wilson doubts if “ice throws” will be a problem.

That is because company officials have assured him turbines posing an “ice throw” threat will be automatically shut down prior to a problem arising.

Wilson is also confident the state PSC will take steps to assure no one is endangered by “ice throws.”

Supporting Wilson’s position were two representatives from Dominion Resources, a company which owns a share of the project.

DR’s Robert Orndorff told commissioners the company values its reputation as a good neighbor and will guard against any “ice throw” situations. He said studies are underway to assess whatever danger may exist from “several” turbines.

“We will not operate any turbine that creates a hazardous condition for the general public,” he stated.

A second DR representative, Emil Abram, cited the company’s long-term interest in safety at all of its facilities. He stated: “We have no interest in creating a safety hazard.”

Orndorff said an example of the company’s willingness to be a good neighbor can be seen in efforts to fix construction-related damage on Grassy Ridge Road.

This damage has been a bone of contention for some residents.

He said the company worked with the state Department of Highways to have the road temporarily fixed with a “tar and chip” surface. He said additional repairs will be considered once the windfarm project is completed.

“We will be back on the road in the spring,” Orndorff explained. “It is better than the road I live on.”

Halgren welcomed the road repairs and DR’s stated willingness to assure motorists’ safety. At the same time, he cautioned the whole wind power industry is relatively new to the state and, as a result, regulators are somewhat uncertain about a variety of safety issues.

He suggested concerns about “ice throws” could have been avoided had the project developer made earlier announcements about shutting down turbines during icy conditions.

Halgren said it was a PSC staffer and not residents who first raised questions about possible “ice throws.”

“It is in everyone’s’ best interests to prevent any safety hazards,” said Commissioner Jim Cole.

Commissioner Charlie Goldizen Jr., welcomed statements from the DR representatives about both road repairs and turbine safety. He said the county’s past dealings with the company have always shown them to value safety and good community relations. He said road damages caused by construction equipment are an unavoidable byproduct whenever such work takes place.

“It (DR’s activities) are not a bad-neighbor thing,” Goldizen said. “It (road damages) just come with the package … of development.”

Orndorff said the first turbine to be completed was ready on Aug. 30, although no electricity is expected to be produced until next month. The company is hoping to have a media day sometime in late October.

As of last week’s meeting, eight turbines had been completed. A total of 20 could be done by the end of October.


This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.