[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbine plan stirs winds of Travis' dissent  

Travis Air Force Base officials have taken a stance against proposals to add more than 100 wind turbines in the Montezuma Hills, saying they may interfere with a new radar system the base will begin to install in November.

Approximately 700 wind turbines already are operating in the hills, about 10 miles southeast of the base.

The wind turbine issue will be taken up by the Solano County Planning Commission tonight after being tabled six months ago so that base officials and the applicants could attempt to work out a solution.

It was at the April 19 Planning Commission meeting where the first letter from Travis urged the commission to delay its decision on the wind-farm expansion.

There are two proposals on the table.

The Shiloh II Wind Project would install up to 88 turbines while the Montezuma Wind Project is proposing to build 16 to 23 additional turbines.

The problem is that Air Force officials say the proposed plan to install the additional turbines could cause problems with future aircraft-control radar, called ASR-11, at Travis.

Travis’ Lt. Colonel Shawn Nelson said in a March letter that the blades of the turbines may lead to smaller planes appearing to drop off the radar screens while images of others may appear when they aren’t actually there.

Applicants of the smaller Montezuma project have agreed to postpone their proposal as details are worked out, but enXco, an energy company based in Escondido in Southern California, claims any problem with its Shiloh II project can be solved satisfactorily within two months.

A second letter since has been written by Col. Steven Arquiette, the commandant at Travis, refuting enXco’s claim and urging the planning commission to delay any decisions until the base’s new radar system is installed and operational, which would be in October 2008.

Arquitte’s letter claims the new turbines could pose a threat to civil and military aircraft as well as to the surrounding community.

Mike Yankovich, primary planner with Solano County, said the commission will have to decide whether to delay a decision for two months, indefinitely, or to completely deny the projects.

“It’s going to be continued, the issue is until when,” Yankovich said. “The commission will want to know why this company thinks they can do it in two months.”

The Solano County Planning Commission meets at 7 this evening in the Board of Supervisors Chamber, 675 Texas St. in Fairfield.

By Danny Bernardini
Staff Writer

The Reporter

4 October 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.