[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind energy company is ignoring the facts  

Facts are indeed stubborn entities and cannot be morphed into something different than what they are. Despite this fact, proponents for wind turbines struggle mightily to do so. Their distortions are so patently transparent as to be an insult to one’s intelligence. They do this without any apparent sign of embarrassment. Proposals that support Highland New Wind Development are riddled with loopholes. Nature needs no enemies with friends like The Nature Conservancy, which supports the construction of wind turbines in Highland County.

HNWD states that there is no evidence that wind energy plants have killed protected species. It conveniently ignores that the Altamont Pass facility killed 500 eagles and other raptors annually. They also conveniently ignore that the migratory flyways of the endangered Indiana bat and the Virginia big-eared bat are within the projected HNWD site. HNWD chooses not to acknowledge the presence of bald and golden eagles in Highland County and their likelihood of becoming casualties of the windmills. Proponents of HNWD continue to blithely ignore Tucker County’s experience of the large bat and songbird kill by their wind turbines and fail to recognize that this is what will happen in Highland County. As expressed before, species do not recognize political borders. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

HNWD proposes establishing allowable takes (kills) per turbine per year. If 6.9 species “of greatest conservation need” are killed (no mention is made of lesser conservation need) HNWD will permanently preserve 50 acres of red spruce. What, pray tell, is the relevance of a species of greatest conservation need to 50 acres of red spruce- other than a possible outcome of a vast red spruce preserve and no species of greatest conservation need? Who determines conservation needs?

The monitor is the linchpin of any monitoring system and must have the capacity for dealing with a giant matrix of variables and adhering to robust scientific principles- without which, all is charade.

In keeping with state hearing examiner Alexander Skirpan’s admonition to know candidates’ positions, it might be useful to canvass each candidate in the forthcoming election as to whether he or she supports wind turbines in Highland County.

Orren L. Royal, M.D. M.S (Biology),

Capt. (MC) USN (Ret.)

Dublin, Va.

The Recorder

27 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.