[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbines are source of misery  

I live 930 metres from Deeping St Nicholas windfarm just south of Spalding in Lincolnshire. There are six other houses a similar distance away from the turbines but ours is the only one downwind and our nearest neighbours are a quarter to half a mile away.The windfarm became operational early last June, and within three days we started having problems with the noise and hum emanating from it.

We did not object to the windfarm in the planning stage as we did not believe there would be any issues for us and that wind power was a good way of meeting the energy gap.

We did read negative reports on the Internet but could not believe there would be issues for us as we were never specifically consulted, nor were background noise readings taken at our house.

We have had constant issues with loud noises and low frequency sounds that create a hum in the house all the time. We have kept a log throughout.

Many times last summer we were woken by loud “whooshing” noises, that stopped us sleeping for more than four hours a night.

We told our environmental health department and they came out and were astonished at the loud noise recordings they made.

Due to the Government’s preferred measure for assessing the noise from wind turbines, known as ETSU-R-97, which has the effect of averaging noise peaks out over a period, there is no recourse to justice under existing British law.

We now know that although we were initially told that fewer than 5 per cent of windfarms have this problem the reality is likely to be more than 10 per cent.

Research by the DTI and Defra which will be reported soon will give further and better information on this.

We now know that we suffer from a phenomenon known as aerodynamic or amplitude modulation. We also know that “in general, turbines are noisier now than in 1993”.

This seems to support the fact that the Government found it necessary to set a specific measurement for wind turbine noise, and that there was a Noise Working Group that operates between DTI and Defra.

This group has publicly acknowledged that aerodynamic modulation is not fully understood.

We know and accept that not every windfarm creates noise issues but those that do make life impossible for those who live near them – and by near I mean less that 2km or 1.5 miles.

As a result of our difficulties we have been forced to find an alternative place to sleep – our sleeping house, five miles away in Spalding itself – so we have effectively abandoned our home.

Our house, which would previously have been worth about £180,000 is now likely to have a value of just the land – £35-50,000 and would not be marketable as a home for people to live in any longer.

Jane Davis

Spalding, Lincs

Western Morning News

25 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.