[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

I can understand windfarm concerns — council chairman  

Proposals for a five-turbine wind farm between Bilsthorpe and Eakring will have an ‘adverse impact’ on the landscape, leading councillors have admitted.

Developers Harworth Power and Eakring Farming submitted controversial new plans earlier this year for the 100m-high turbines at two locations – the former Bilsthorpe Colliery site and Stonish Hill, near Eakring.

The project was discussed by Nottinghamshire County Council’s cabinet last Wednesday, and although members did not object to the plans they raised a number of concerns to Newark & Sherwood District Council – which will decide on the plans.

A report presented to cabinet members said there would be a major visual impact from the large turbines, but this could be outweighed by the environmental benefits of using renewable energy.

It says: “The scale of the development is considered to be beyond the capacity of the landscape within which it is set, resulting in a dominating feature with a significant visual impact upon a wide area of landscape that is sensitive to change.”

The reports adds that the wind farm, which is expected to produce electricity for up to 5,500 households, would help the county meet targets for producing renewable energy.

Two protest groups – the Eakring Turbine Action Group (ETAG) and Bilsthorpe Residents Against Turbines (BRATS) – have been set up fight against the plans, amid concerns the two sites are unsuitable and the turbines will blight the landscape.

And Coun David Kirkham, leader of the county council, told Chad after the meeting he understood the concerns of residents.

He said: “We didn’t raise any objections, but we are asking the planning committee to take into consideration some of the issues we are making.

“Generally, I have got nothing against windfarms producing energy, but I can understand the concerns there are about noise. When it is near people’s houses I can understand the worries they have.”

In November last year planning chiefs at Newark & Sherwood District Council turned down plans for a similar scheme with seven turbines in the same location.

At the time fears were raised by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) that the turbines would interfere with radar – but developers hope they have tackled this by having fewer turbines at a lower height.

By Helen Lambourne


21 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch