[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Board rejects bid to halt Freedom wind project  

FREEDOM – The town’s Board of Appeals has rejected the latest bid to halt construction of three electricity wind turbines on Beaver Ridge, though the ultimate decision on the project could be made by a Superior Court justice.

The board voted unanimously on Sept. 12 to deny an appeal lodged by Steve Bennett, Erin Bennett-Wade and Jeff Keating, all of whom own land adjacent to the proposed site of the $10 million project.

“We denied the appeal on all three counts,” said Addison Chase, chairman of the Board of Appeals.

The Bennetts and Keating argued over two days of hearings that the Planning Board erred in its July decision to issue a building permit to Portland-based Competitive Energy Service because the large pieces of the turbine can only be delivered to the Beaver Ridge site by trespassing onto neighboring property while turning from North Palermo Road onto Sibley Road.

There is nothing in the town’s building application, however, that talks about access, Chase said.

“The assumption is (the code enforcement officer) looked at the site, looked at the project, and said there is no apparent need for a permit,” Chase said. “There isn’t anything that automatically triggers a permit.”

The appellants also argued that the final 1,000 feet of Sibley Road has been abandoned by the town, which means that abutters own the property to the road’s center line, thus Competitive Energy lacks right, title and interest to make upgrades needed to deliver the turbine parts.

But the planning board was not required to look at whether or not the road will need to be upgraded. Decisions on who owns the road and how it how it can be used will likely be made by a Waldo County Superior Court judge. Steve Bennett appealed to the court earlier this year.

“In essence, permission to upgrade the road hasn’t been asked for and it hasn’t been granted,” Chase said. “I don’t know when that bridge will be crossed.”

The Bennetts and Keating also argued that the project will need approval from the state’s Department of Environmental Protection and that the town has historically required applicants to secure all state permits before granting a building permit.

While the enforcement officer does require a permit for projects in certain situations, applicants were not always required to secure state permits in advance of a permit from the town, Chase said.

“We basically said the CEO didn’t always, and in this case didn’t have to, bring in the state to get approval,” Chase said. “The state may have to get involved, but that’s not what our permitting process is about.”

Competitive Energy first applied to erect three 400-foot turbines more than a year ago, but the company retracted its original application to give the town time to develop a commercial development review ordinance, which voters approved in August of last year.

The company resubmitted its application a year ago, and in December the Planning Board agreed by a 5-1 vote that the project complied with the ordinance.

A group of neighbors to the proposed project, led by the Bennetts, appealed that decision.

In March the Board of Appeals determined the project did not meet the ordinance standards for noise and bonding and overturned the Planning Board’s decision.

In June, however, residents voted to repeal the commercial development ordinance, thus opening the door for Competitive Energy to reapply for a permit. The Planning Board granted a building permit on July 12.

By Craig Crosby
Staff Writer


19 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.