[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Attorney wrong on Bovina voters  

Delaware County Attorney Richard Spinney’s comments made at the Sept. 7 hearing held in the Supreme Court in Norwich (article of Sept. 8 by Tom Grace) are illustrative of the continuing battle for voters’ rights and his personal resentment for who is waging this important legal battle.

When he said that, “these people don’t really live in Bovina,” it was false. All plaintiffs in the voters’ suit live in Bovina in real homes at real addresses. None is a seasonal or “summer” home.

The point of the suit is that they also have other residences outside of Delaware County but want Delaware County as their place for voting. This is not merely wishful thinking but the law in New York state.

Spinney’s other comment that “they have a lot of money and a New York City lawyer” is outrageous and provides a clear window to a prevailing and ugly prejudice. In fact, two plaintiffs have no income other than their Social Security payments that they live on month to month.

The so-called New York City lawyer, Bruce Krause, is from the prestigious firm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher and asked to participate in the case due to its importance for voters’ rights in New York.

About the only thing Mr. Spinney said that was correct was that the massive voter challenge was related to Bovina banning wind turbines, something that all eight plaintiffs supported through the Alliance for Bovina.

Larry Karam

The Daily Star

18 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.