[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm petitions ruled invalid  

A group of Stephenson County residents gather Sunday night to talk wind farms. They say they like their quiet, rural surroundings and they don’t want their homes disturbed by whirring, 400-foot tall wind turbines. It’s not a new issue. They filed suit to block two wind farms from coming to the county late last year. But now they say the debate has spiraled to new heights.

“They’ve transcended wind farms. They have now hit at a core right and privilege in a democratic society,” says Stephenson County resident Mike King.

Back in July, the Stephenson County board changed zoning to accomodate the construction of wind farms. The new policy eliminates public hearings previously required before land could be rezoned to house a wind turbine.

Some residents say the change took away their right to address local government. They submitted a 17 hundred-signature petition opposing the switch. After examing the petition, the Stephenson County state’s attorney, John Vogt ruled Wednesday only 1,387 of the signatures were valid. That left petitioners five names short of forcing a three-quarter board vote instead of a simple majority to approve a zoning change. And that means July’s simple majority approval stands.

“It could have been five the other way and we would have honored that. But it wasn’t,” says Stephenson County board member Jeff Mikkelsen.

The state’s attorney declined to comment but Mikkelsen says signatures were eliminated either because petitioners did not specify their complaints, they were not landowners, or because the names were illegible. Each signature had a phone number attached to it, but the state’s attorney did not call to verify any of the names.

“I don’t understand how they can claim that there aren’t enough signatures without making any attempt to investigate,” says Stephenson County resident Carol Johnson.

Wind farm opponents met Sunday night to discuss whether or not to file yet another costly lawsuit against the county. They say they feel that’s their only recourse now. Mikkelsen says legal action is a citizen’s perogative. He adds the board is committed to promoting wind power and many farmers in the county are excited to gain a lucrative turbine.

By Alice Barr


16 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.