| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind farm petitions ruled invalid
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A group of Stephenson County residents gather Sunday night to talk wind farms. They say they like their quiet, rural surroundings and they don’t want their homes disturbed by whirring, 400-foot tall wind turbines. It’s not a new issue. They filed suit to block two wind farms from coming to the county late last year. But now they say the debate has spiraled to new heights.
“They’ve transcended wind farms. They have now hit at a core right and privilege in a democratic society,” says Stephenson County resident Mike King.
Back in July, the Stephenson County board changed zoning to accomodate the construction of wind farms. The new policy eliminates public hearings previously required before land could be rezoned to house a wind turbine.
Some residents say the change took away their right to address local government. They submitted a 17 hundred-signature petition opposing the switch. After examing the petition, the Stephenson County state’s attorney, John Vogt ruled Wednesday only 1,387 of the signatures were valid. That left petitioners five names short of forcing a three-quarter board vote instead of a simple majority to approve a zoning change. And that means July’s simple majority approval stands.
“It could have been five the other way and we would have honored that. But it wasn’t,” says Stephenson County board member Jeff Mikkelsen.
The state’s attorney declined to comment but Mikkelsen says signatures were eliminated either because petitioners did not specify their complaints, they were not landowners, or because the names were illegible. Each signature had a phone number attached to it, but the state’s attorney did not call to verify any of the names.
“I don’t understand how they can claim that there aren’t enough signatures without making any attempt to investigate,” says Stephenson County resident Carol Johnson.
Wind farm opponents met Sunday night to discuss whether or not to file yet another costly lawsuit against the county. They say they feel that’s their only recourse now. Mikkelsen says legal action is a citizen’s perogative. He adds the board is committed to promoting wind power and many farmers in the county are excited to gain a lucrative turbine.
By Alice Barr
16 September 2007
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=7077 ]
