[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Economics of wind power do not add up  

Barry Lees lightly dismisses the need to back up wind generators (Letters, September 15) with the assertion: “If it’s calm somewhere in the country, there’s a very good good chance that it will be windy in another part.” Would he be happy to leave the security of our electricity supply to chance?

It is perfectly possible for the whole country to experience anti-cyclonic weather with resultant calm conditions. Indeed, in Denmark in February 2003, the 6000-plus wind turbines produced absolutely nothing. His assertion that pumped storage could be the answer to the intermittence of wind power does not stand scrutiny.

The only pumped storage in Scotland at the moment is at Cruachan and has a capacity of 440MW, just about enough to absorb the output of one windfarm. The idea that we should build more for this purpose is fanciful as the capital cost would make the, already dodgy, economics of wind power totally unacceptable to even the most gullible observer.

I am far from being a fossil-fuel Luddite. I agree that there are other viable renewables out there which must be developed, and some of these may contribute to the base load capacity we must have.

However, windfarms are clearly seen by the government as the only game in town, hence its predisposition to approve their construction against total local opposition. My objection to windfarms is that the damage to the landscape is out of all proportion to their tiny contribution to reducing CO2 output. If the large subsidies poured into wind power were to be applied to reducing demand, the effect on CO2 output would be immediate and long lasting.

Andrew Mitchell, 4 Glenpark Avenue, Prestwick.

On the subject of windmills and renewable energy sources, comparing Iain J McConnell’s reasoned argument (September 15), backed up by expert observation, with Barry Lees’s frenetic pie in the sky fantasies, one can only hope that the former’s viewpoint will prevail over the emotive claptrap issued by the latter and his fellow green woodland elves, deluded by the smoke and mirrors campaign largely emanating from the renewable energy profiteers.

Allan Todd, 21 Bowfield Road, West Kilbride.

The Herald

17 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.