LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Poll phrasing showed bias, skewed results 

Wisely, the Star-Gazette states that its online polls are not scientific in nature. That statement truly applies to the recent wind farm survey. Who would disagree to an alternate source of energy that would reduce our dependence on foreign oil?

The concern I have is how the question was worded. It showed bias toward acceptance of wind turbines.

I’m confident that the majority of those who responded live in the cities and suburbs. Simply put, they don’t have to look at or hear giant wind turbines 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

I would like them to consider this scenario: A person buys a piece of property in the country and builds an expensive home. Next, the people who own the adjacent property hear about wind farms and the monetary rewards. Looks like a lot of easy money, and it is. Now, the new homebuilder will be looking at and hearing giant wind turbines instead of a quiet, pristine countryside. Property values will likely decrease.

I believe the question should have been worded, “Would you like a giant wind turbine in your backyard?” I would like to see the survey results on that question.

Per usual, local governments’ and landowners’ quest for money takes precedence over empathy for the neighbor and nature’s beauty.

George D. Radford

Corning

Star-Gazette

13 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky