[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Try multi-category search (beta) »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Moffat Windfarm Scheme Approved — More to Come  

A controversial £200 million windfarm development which faced an onslaught of opposition has been given the green light by Scottish ministers.

That means CRE Energy can press ahead with the construction of 71 turbines at Harestanes south west of Moffat.

It’s the end of a saga which began back in March 2004 and saw a major local inquiry last summer.

The move strengthens the fears of objectors that the M74 corridor could be become a windfarm dominated area.

Airtricity wants to put up a further 161 turbines on the hills south of Biggar.

The Harestanes turbines will reach a height of 411 feet and will generate 213 Megawatts (MW) of electricity, enough to supply 120,000 homes.

Last year Scottish Executive Reporter David Gordon spent five weeks in Moffat taking evidence during a public local inquiry sparked by the council’s decision to refuse the application in the wake of strong opposition from the public.

Mr Gordon also spent three weeks looking at the Upper Clyde application and a decision is still under consideration.

However, a Scottish Government spokesman said the Reporter had found in favour of the Harestanes application.

Announcing the decision energy minister Jim Mather said it was time for Scotland to harness its “vast potential” to generate electricity from renewable energy.

He said: “The evidence being that at the moment, the combined generation potential of the renewable energy projects currently with Scottish Ministers amounts to up to six gigawatts of electricity.

“The proposal at Harestanes will provide enough power for 120,000 homes, another step to fulfilling our green energy potential.

“Ministers agree with the Reporter and have granted consent subject to conditions.”

The public inquiry attracted opposition from a number of groups based as far away as groups stretch from Ayrshire, Berwickshire, Midlothian and Northumberland.

Local protest group, Trees Not Turbines, Save the Ae Forest, gave evidence to the inquiry claiming the development would do serious damage to the local landscape, wildlife and tourist trade.

Dumfries MSP Dr Elaine Murray has also voiced opposition to the development although she always suspected it would get the go ahead.

Disappointed Dumfriesshire MP David Mundell said: “Whilst I am a supporter of renewable energy, a development of this size is simply inappropriate for rural Dumfries and Galloway – particularly when it could be next to so many other developments, taking into account their accumulative impact along with other major windfarm developments in the area.”

Sep 12 2007

By Doug Archibald

icdumfries.icnetwork.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: