[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

CWIF call to take wider view  

A community council in Caithness is being urged to look beyond its own boundaries when considering the impact of new wind-farm ventures.

Dunnet and Canisbay Community Council will tonight (Wednesday) consider commissioning a survey of local people’s views on a renewed bid to develop a turbine venture at Stroupster.

While supporting the move, a prominent anti-wind-farm campaigner is urging the community councillors to discuss other planned wind farms at Durran and Spittal Hill.

Stuart Young wants them to reconsider their reluctance to take a stance on schemes outwith their patch.

Mr Young, of Caithness Windfarm Information Forum, believes they should firm up a stance on Durran and Spittal Hill as the turbines would be clearly visible from large parts of the community council area.

Mr Young said yesterday: “I’m delighted that they are taking Stroupster seriously. The turbines would be so dominating that it would be an absolutely disastrous proposal for local people were it given the go-ahead.

“However, I believe the community council should be informing and consulting with the people they represent on the two other sites which would also have a major impact on their area.”

Mr Young has prepared photomontages of a number of wind farms.

Community council secretary Irene Hendrie yesterday said members had decided at a previous meeting that they do not have a remit for wind farms outwith the community council boundaries. She said: “Stroupster is within our area and affects the community we represent, so there is a proposal that we carry out a survey to find out what people want.”

Npower renewables had its application for a 12-turbine scheme on a woodland at Stroupster, near Auckengill, turned down by the Highland Council in June last year. It has since re-applied.

John O’Groat Journal

12 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.