LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Industry bias evident in wind-power article 

I respond to the Aug. 24 Dispatch article “Generate jobs with wind power, study says.”

First, the report was done by Environment Ohio, an advocacy group funded by environmentalists, alternative power companies and utilities such as Florida Power & Light Co., General Electric and others that have a vested interest in seeing their equipment in Ohio.

The third paragraph of the article reported that 3,100 jobs would be created in the manufacturing of wind-related products. These are the same 3,100 jobs that have been promised in every one of the 20-plus states in which the wind utilities have lobbied. If it were true, there already would be 60,000 people working in the wind industry. I don’t see them.

The caveat is that the jobs will be created only when 20 percent of our electricity is generated by wind. Environmental advocate Amy Gomberg and Environment Ohio know that that is an impossible goal. There would have to be 450-foot turbines, taller than the Riffe Center, dotting every 2.2-mile square of the land and lakes in Ohio to even come close to that amount.

Gomberg also is concerned that we have only a small time window to take advantage of the wind utilities’ largesse. If we don’t act now, she says, they will leave. Hardly. Not while there are state and federal tax incentives, tax credits and tax abatements to keep them here.

Let’s look at the reality, not the hype. Ohio and every other state east of the Mississippi that is not on the ocean is just barely on the ragged edge of acceptability for a few turbines in a few high places that are already lived on, farmed on and gazed at for their beauty.

This is a railroad that needs to be sidetracked. Legislating 20 percent of our power from wind won’t make it any more feasible; it will just make us throw our money at it until we cry uncle.

KEITH NASON

Zanesfield

The Columbus Dispatch

7 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky