[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

End of Syderstone wind farm plan?  

Campaigners against a proposed windfarm near Syderstone are celebrating after West Norfolk Council refused plans for the “first stage” of the development.

E.on UK, one of the country’s largest energy suppliers, had hoped to erect a 50- metre climate monitoring mast on farmland between the parish of Bagthorpe-with-Barmer and Syderstone, known as Chiplow.

But members of the development control board refused planning permission at a meeting on Monday after steadfast opposition from residents and parish councils in East Rudham, Stanhoe and Syderstone.

The council received 249 letters opposing the mast, many from residents who felt approving it could give the green light to plans for a five-turbine windfarm on the site.

A representative speaking on behalf on E.on Energy, told the board the company “had made no secret” of a possible windfarm at the site and wanted to stress any decision made on the mast would not affect a later application for the wind farm.

E.On had already decided to develop the site and is expected to make a full application in the autumn. The mast would help the company decide what type of windfarm would be most suited to the location in preparation for this second application.

But Syderstone Parish Council chairman Mr Gerry Taylor said the mast represented the first part of the company’s development programme and a “softening-up phase.”

The wind farm received “emphatic rejection” in a parish poll last month, which enjoyed a 48.8 percent turnout and saw 77 per cent of voters opposing the plans, he added.

Concerns over the mast’s environmental impact were also raised at the meeting. There are fears the mast would impact on local wildlife, including Pink-footed geese, but the developers had included bird deflectors in the scheme.

Councillor Hugh Symington said the mast and deflectors would have a negative impact on the appearance of the countryside.

The board voted to refuse permission and the decision was met with applause from the public area, which was crowded with opponents of the scheme.

Speaking after the meeting Mr Thompson, vice- chairman of the action group Against Turbines At Chiplow (ATAC) formed to fight the plans, said: “With more than 500 offshore turbines approved along the Norfolk coast, the county has more than met its quota for renewable energy.

“I believe tonight’s decision sends a clear message to the power companies and greedy landowners that there should be no more on- shore wind farms blighting our beautiful Norfolk countryside.”

By Daisy Wallage

Lynn News

7 September 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.