[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine ordinance deemed too restrictive  

Fall River – A comprehensive ordinance regulating wind turbines was temporarily put on the back burner after city officials and a private company said it was far too restrictive as drafted.

Some concerns expressed this week to the City Council’s legislation and ordinance committee came from the head of the sewer treatment facility and representatives of Lightolier at the Fall River Industrial Park.

The light manufacturer employs more than 700 people and has studied and sought grants for nearly a year to build a turbine on its 32-acre site, said Loretta George, a company spokeswoman.

Terrance J. Sullivan, the city’s administrator of public utilities, said passage of the law would jeopardize a $41,000 grant received to test the feasibility of a wind turbine at the sewer treatment plant on Bay Street.

A 140-foot test tower was erected on the site about a month ago to help the city determine potential electricity savings. Its annual plant expense is $1.3 million, Sullivan said.

In both cases, Sullivan and George said the setbacks would cut the legs from their prospective projects.

As written, any wind turbine would need to be at least twice the distance as its height from a property line or building.

The height envisioned for both the sewer plant and the Lightolier manufacturing company is in the 300- to 400-foot range, requiring property line setbacks of 600 to 800 feet.

The height restriction drafted for commercial structures was 300 feet, although the Zoning Board of Appeals issuing required special permits could waive the height limit.

“The setbacks would have stopped me dead in my tracks,” Sullivan said, stating there was no provision to waive them.

He proposed in an Aug. 1 letter that municipal projects be exempted from setbacks and height requirements.

The city’s already hired Boreal Renewable Development in Arlington to conduct a $48,000 feasibility study, all but about $7,000 paid for by a grant from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative.

The city envisions a $2 million to $4 million wind turbine cost, and construction grants would be sought.

After the ordinance committee met for an hour and decided significant amendments to the proposal were needed, the council Tuesday night withdrew the ordinance.
Major ordinance revisions require a new process and public hearings.

The council sought amended wind energy facility regulations for the equipment to be put in appropriate and safe locations.

It included standards for placement, construction, design, modification and removal.
Turbines generating more than 25 kilowatts would be considered commercial, those with lower capacity residential.

Commercial equipment would be restricted to industrial, industrial park, water and open space/recreation districts with at least five acres of land. Residential units would require two acres and could be up to 70 feet high, unless the ZBA granted an exception.

Thomas F. McGuire Jr., city corporation counsel, said the ordinance he drafted at the council’s request was “very restrictive” and meant to be adjusted.

He included “all of the restrictions from other communities.”

“They asked me for help in drafting it, but they didn’t tell me what they wanted, so I put in everything,” McGuire said. “It’s absolutely too restrictive.”

He added, “It’s not intended for adoption. It just tells you what you can do.”

By Michael Holtzman
GateHouse News Service

The Herald News

31 August 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.