[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Three turbines still no good, say protesters  

A campaign group says its objections to a proposed windfarm site on the moors above Bacup still stand, despite a reduction in the number of turbines.

London-based Coronation Power now wants to put three 410ft turbines on the moors between Britannia and Sharneyford, instead of the original four proposed.

But the Friends of the South Pennines group says the reduction in the size of the windfarm will make little difference on its overall impact.

Spokeswoman Denise McGowan said she believed turbine four had been removed from the plan following advice issued to the company over the potential danger to low-flying planes by National Air Traffic Services, because the area over Bacup and Reaps Moss is used as a stacking system for flights landing at Manchester Airport.

But she argued that even with three turbines, this danger could still be present for low flying aircraft, saying: ‘There’s quite a lot of light aircraft travelling over Reaps Moss; obviously they’re quite low on the flight path and there’s many a time where it’s inclement and there’s low cloud, so we’re still concerned it would be a safety issue.’

She said the group was also objecting on the grounds that one of the turbines was still in a greenbelt area and because of the potential disturbance of peat that would be caused by the turbines’ erection.

She went on: ‘The reduction in turbines is not really making any difference to our stand.

‘We’re still concerned about the ecological devastation this could have; there are also people in the area that are on natural water supplies and there’s concern that they would lose them.’

Coronation Power managing director Vickram Mirchandani said: ‘There was an objection from National Air Traffic Services that four was too much and for that reason we dropped the fourth turbine and the objection was withdrawn.

‘One added advantage is that before the turbines were in an L-shape but now it’s three turbines in a straight line, so from a visual impact point of view it’s more pleasing to the eye.’

The amended planning application has been lodged with Rossendale Council.

By Jenny Brookfield

The Rossendale Free Press

30 August 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch